The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies
Open accessAbstract
We performed a retrospective comparison of presenting features, planned treatment, complete remission (CR) rate, and outcome of 321 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) ages 16 to 20 years with newly diagnosed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who were treated on consecutive trials in either the Children's Cancer Group (CCG) or the Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) from 1988 to 2001. CR rates were identical, 90% for both CALGB and CCG AYAs. CCG AYAs had a 63% event-free survival (EFS) and 67% overall survival (OS) at 7 years in contrast to the CALGB AYAs, in which 7-year EFS was only 34% (P < .001; relative hazard rate [RHR] = 2.2) and OS was 46% (P < .001; RHR = 1.9). While CALGB AYAs aged 16 to 17 years achieved similar outcomes to all CCG AYAs with a 7-year EFS of 55%, the EFS for 18- to 20-year-old CALGB patients was only 29%. Comparison of the regimens showed that CCG AYAs received earlier and more intensive central nervous system prophylaxis and higher cumulative doses of nonmyelosuppressive agents. There were no differences in outcomes of those who reached maintenance therapy on time compared with those who were delayed. Based on these observations, a prospective study for AYAs with ALL using the more successful approach of the CCG has been initiated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
Cited by
Breast Cancer, Version 4.2017, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
Gradishar, W. J., Anderson, B. O., Balassanian, R., Blair, S. L., Burstein, H. J., Cyr, A., Elias, A. D., Farrar, W. B., Forero, A., Giordano, S. H., et al. (2018) · Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network · doi:10.6004/jnccn.2018.0012 · Cited by 1,609
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comprehensive review and 2017 update
Terwilliger, T., & Abdul-Hay, M. (2017) · Blood Cancer Journal · doi:10.1038/bcj.2017.53 · Cited by 1,288
Inaba, H., Greaves, M., & Mullighan, C. G. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)62187-4 · Cited by 1,074
Outcomes for children and adolescents with cancer: challenges for the twenty-first century
Smith, M. A., Seibel, N. L., Altekruse, S. F., Ries, L. A. G., Melbert, D. L., O'Leary, M., Smith, F. O., & Reaman, G. H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2009.27.0421 · Cited by 1,026
Malard, F., & Mohty, M. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)33018-1 · Cited by 773
Metadata
- Authors
- Stock, W., La, M., Sanford, B., Bloomfield, C. D., Vardiman, J. W., Gaynon, P., Larson, R. A., & Nachman, J.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2008-09-01
- Volume
- 112
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1646-1654
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2010729137
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 31.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2008-01-130237
- The paper
- Stock, W., La, M., Sanford, B., Bloomfield, C. D., Vardiman, J. W., Gaynon, P., Larson, R. A., & Nachman, J. (2008). What determines the outcomes for adolescents and young adults with acute lymphoblastic leukemia treated on cooperative group protocols? A comparison of Children's Cancer Group and Cancer and Leukemia Group B studies. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2008-01-130237
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.