Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies

Open access
Fandy, Tamer E., Herman, James G., Kerns, Patrick, Jiemjit, Anchalee, Sugar, Elizabeth A., Choi, Si-Ho, Yang, Allen S., Aucott, Timothy, Dauses, Tianna, Odchimar-Reissig, Rosalie, Licht, Jonathan, McConnell, Melanie J., Nasrallah, Chris, Kim, Marianne K. H., Zhang, Weijia, Sun, Yezou, Murgo, Anthony, Espinoza-Delgado, Igor, Oteiza, Katharine, Owoeye, Ibitayo, Silverman, Lewis R., Gore, Steven D., Carraway, Hetty E.·2009·Blood

Abstract

Sequential administration of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, the mechanism behind their clinical efficacy remains controversial. In this study, the methylation dynamics of 4 TSGs (p15INK4B, CDH-1, DAPK-1, and SOCS-1) were studied in sequential bone marrow samples from 30 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who completed a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy with 5-azacytidine and entinostat. Reversal of promoter methylation after therapy was observed in both clinical responders and nonresponders across all genes. There was no association between clinical response and either baseline methylation or methylation reversal in the bone marrow or purified CD34+ population, nor was there an association with change in gene expression. Transient global hypomethylation was observed in samples after treatment but was not associated with clinical response. Induction of histone H3/H4 acetylation and the DNA damage–associated variant histone γ-H2AX was observed in peripheral blood samples across all dose cohorts. In conclusion, methylation reversal of candidate TSGs during cycle 1 of therapy was not predictive of clinical response to combination “epigenetic” therapy. This trial is registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00101179.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2009-02-203547

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Fandy, T. E., Herman, J. G., Kerns, P., Jiemjit, A., Sugar, E. A., Choi, S.-H., Yang, A. S., Aucott, T., Dauses, T., Odchimar-Reissig, R., Licht, J., McConnell, M. J., Nasrallah, C., Kim, M. K. H., Zhang, W., Sun, Y., Murgo, A., Espinoza-Delgado, I., Oteiza, K., Owoeye, I., Silverman, L. R., Gore, S. D., & Carraway, H. E.
Venue
Blood
Published
2009-09-24
Volume
114
Issue
13
Pages
2764-2773
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1966010937
Cited by
282
References
2
FWCI
20.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2009-02-203547
The paper
Fandy, T. E., Herman, J. G., Kerns, P., Jiemjit, A., Sugar, E. A., Choi, S.-H., Yang, A. S., Aucott, T., Dauses, T., Odchimar-Reissig, R., Licht, J., McConnell, M. J., Nasrallah, C., Kim, M. K. H., Zhang, W., Sun, Y., Murgo, A., Espinoza-Delgado, I., Oteiza, K., . . . Carraway, H. E. (2009). Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-02-203547

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.