The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Early epigenetic changes and DNA damage do not predict clinical response in an overlapping schedule of 5-azacytidine and entinostat in patients with myeloid malignancies
Open accessAbstract
Sequential administration of DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) inhibitors and histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors has demonstrated clinical efficacy in patients with hematologic malignancies. However, the mechanism behind their clinical efficacy remains controversial. In this study, the methylation dynamics of 4 TSGs (p15INK4B, CDH-1, DAPK-1, and SOCS-1) were studied in sequential bone marrow samples from 30 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who completed a minimum of 4 cycles of therapy with 5-azacytidine and entinostat. Reversal of promoter methylation after therapy was observed in both clinical responders and nonresponders across all genes. There was no association between clinical response and either baseline methylation or methylation reversal in the bone marrow or purified CD34+ population, nor was there an association with change in gene expression. Transient global hypomethylation was observed in samples after treatment but was not associated with clinical response. Induction of histone H3/H4 acetylation and the DNA damage–associated variant histone γ-H2AX was observed in peripheral blood samples across all dose cohorts. In conclusion, methylation reversal of candidate TSGs during cycle 1 of therapy was not predictive of clinical response to combination “epigenetic” therapy. This trial is registered with http://www.clinicaltrials.gov under NCT00101179.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
DNA damage activates ATM through intermolecular autophosphorylation and dimer dissociation
Bakkenist, C. J., & Kastan, M. B. (2003) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01368 · Cited by 3,466
Cellular differentiation, cytidine analogs and DNA methylation
Jones, P. A., & Taylor, S. M. (1980) · Cell · doi:10.1016/0092-8674(80)90237-8 · Cited by 1,831
Cited by
DNMT3A Mutations in Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Ley, T. J., Ding, L., Walter, M. J., McLellan, M. D., Lamprecht, T., Larson, D. E., Kandoth, C., Payton, J. E., Baty, J., Welch, J., et al. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1005143 · Cited by 1,983
γH2AX: a sensitive molecular marker of DNA damage and repair
Mah, L.-J., El-Osta, A., & Karagiannis, T. C. (2010) · Leukemia · doi:10.1038/leu.2010.6 · Cited by 1,557
Outcome of High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome After Azacitidine Treatment Failure
Prébet, T., Gore, S. D., Esterni, B., Gardin, C., Itzykson, R., Thepot, S., Dreyfus, F., Rauzy, O. B., Recher, C., Adès, L., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2011.35.8135 · Cited by 475
Self-citationEpigenetic cancer therapy: rationales, targets and drugs
Rius, M., & Lyko, F. (2012) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2011.601 · Cited by 157
Entinostat: a promising treatment option for patients with advanced breast cancer
Connolly, R. M., Rudek, M. A., & Piekarz, R. (2017) · Future Oncology · doi:10.2217/fon-2016-0526 · Cited by 148
Raffoux, E., Cras, A., Recher, C., Boëlle, P.-Y., de Labarthe, A., Turlure, P., Marolleau, J.-P., Reman, O., Gardin, C., Victor, M., et al. (2010) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.106 · Cited by 134
Entinostat for treatment of solid tumors and hematologic malignancies
Knipstein, J., & Gore, L. (2011) · Expert Opinion on Investigational Drugs · doi:10.1517/13543784.2011.613822 · Cited by 110
Digging deep into “dirty” drugs – modulation of the methylation machinery
Pleyer, L., & Greil, R. (2015) · Drug Metabolism Reviews · doi:10.3109/03602532.2014.995379 · Cited by 84
“Global methylation does not seem to differ between responders and non-responders to AZA or DAC (Daskalakis et al., 2002; Fandy et al., 2009).”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Fandy, T. E., Herman, J. G., Kerns, P., Jiemjit, A., Sugar, E. A., Choi, S.-H., Yang, A. S., Aucott, T., Dauses, T., Odchimar-Reissig, R., Licht, J., McConnell, M. J., Nasrallah, C., Kim, M. K. H., Zhang, W., Sun, Y., Murgo, A., Espinoza-Delgado, I., Oteiza, K., Owoeye, I., Silverman, L. R., Gore, S. D., & Carraway, H. E.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2009-09-24
- Volume
- 114
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 2764-2773
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1966010937
- Cited by
- 282
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 20.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.