Cited by 84Epigenetics and DNA MethylationAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchGenomics and Chromatin Dynamics

Digging deep into “dirty” drugs – modulation of the methylation machinery

Open access
Pleyer, Lisa, Greil, Richard·2015·Drug Metabolism Reviews

Abstract

DNA methylation and histone modification are epigenetic mechanisms that result in altered gene expression and cellular phenotype. The exact role of methylation in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unclear. However, aberrations (e.g. loss-/gain-of-function or up-/down-regulation) in components of epigenetic transcriptional regulation in general, and of the methylation machinery in particular, have been implicated in the pathogenesis of these diseases. In addition, many of these components have been identified as therapeutic targets for patients with MDS/AML, and are also being assessed as potential biomarkers of response or resistance to hypomethylating agents (HMAs). The HMAs 5-azacitidine (AZA) and 2'-deoxy-5-azacitidine (decitabine, DAC) inhibit DNA methylation and have shown significant clinical benefits in patients with myeloid malignancies. Despite being viewed as mechanistically similar drugs, AZA and DAC have differing mechanisms of action. DAC is incorporated 100% into DNA, whereas AZA is incorporated into RNA (80-90%) as well as DNA (10-20%). As such, both drugs inhibit DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs; dependently or independently of DNA replication) resulting in the re-expression of tumor-suppressor genes; however, AZA also has an impact on mRNA and protein metabolism via its inhibition of ribonucleotide reductase, resulting in apoptosis. Herein, we first give an overview of transcriptional regulation, including DNA methylation, post-translational histone-tail modifications, the role of micro-RNA and long-range epigenetic gene silencing. We place special emphasis on epigenetic transcriptional regulation and discuss the implication of various components in the pathogenesis of MDS/AML, their potential as therapeutic targets, and their therapeutic modulation by HMAs and other substances (if known). The main focus of this review is laid on dissecting the rapidly evolving knowledge of AZA and DAC with a special focus on their differing mechanisms of action, and the effect of HMAs on transcriptional regulation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/03602532.2014.995379

Cites

365 of 365 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prolonged time to initial response, typically around 3 months from treatment onset, is consistent with the primary effects of low dose treatment being mediated via DNA demethylation and epigenetic reprogramming as opposed to direct cytotoxicity.

    “The prolonged time to initial response, which typically occurs around 3 months from treatment onset 125 , is consistent with the primary effects of low dose treatment being mediated via DNA demethylation and epigenetic reprogramming as opposed to direct cytotoxicity 126-128 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

4 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 366 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Honjo T Muramatsu M Fagarasan S 2004 AID: How does it aid antibody diversity? Immunity 20 659 668 15189732

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pleyer, L., & Greil, R.
Affiliations
Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
Corresponding author
Pleyer, Lisa
Venue
Drug Metabolism Reviews
Published
2015-01-08
Volume
47
Issue
2
Pages
252-279
ISSN
  • 0360-2532 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-9883
OpenAlex
W1992220938
Cited by
84
References
366
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
0.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Drug Metabolism Reviews (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
Keywords
DNA methylation, histone modifications, myelodysplastic syndrome, acute myeloid leukemia, hypomethylating agents, azacitidine, decitabine, DNA methyltransferases, ribonucleotide reductase, microRNA, therapeutic target
MeSH terms
Decitabine, Animals, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Azacitidine, Clinical Trials as Topic, Humans, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Transcription, Genetic, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, DNA Methylation, Histone Code, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review