Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 780

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long-term outcome of EBV-specific T-cell infusions to prevent or treat EBV-related lymphoproliferative disease in transplant recipients

Open access
Heslop, Helen E., Slobod, Karen S., Pule, Martin A., Hale, Gregory A., Rousseau, Alexandra, Smith, Colton A., Bollard, Catherine M., Liu, Hao, Wu, Meng-Fen, Rochester, Richard J., Amrolia, Persis J., Hurwitz, Julia L., Brenner, Malcolm K., Rooney, Cliona M.·2010·Blood

Abstract

T-cell immunotherapy that takes advantage of Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)–stimulated immunity has the potential to fill an important niche in targeted therapy for EBV-related cancers. To address questions of long-term efficacy, safety, and practicality, we studied 114 patients who had received infusions of EBV-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) at 3 different centers to prevent or treat EBV+ lymphoproliferative disease (LPD) arising after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Toxicity was minimal, consisting mainly of localized swelling at sites of responsive disease. None of the 101 patients who received CTL prophylaxis developed EBV+ LPD, whereas 11 of 13 patients treated with CTLs for biopsy-proven or probable LPD achieved sustained complete remissions. The gene-marking component of this study enabled us to demonstrate the persistence of functional CTLs for up to 9 years. A preliminary analysis indicated that a patient-specific CTL line can be manufactured, tested, and infused for $6095, a cost that compares favorably with other modalities used in the treatment of LPD. We conclude that the CTL lines described here provide safe and effective prophylaxis or treatment for lymphoproliferative disease in transplantation recipients, and the manufacturing methodology is robust and can be transferred readily from one institution to another without loss of reproducibility. The current trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00058812.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2009-08-239186

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 780

Metadata

Authors
Heslop, H. E., Slobod, K. S., Pule, M. A., Hale, G. A., Rousseau, A., Smith, C. A., Bollard, C. M., Liu, H., Wu, M.-F., Rochester, R. J., Amrolia, P. J., Hurwitz, J. L., Brenner, M. K., & Rooney, C. M.
Venue
Blood
Published
2010-02-04
Volume
115
Issue
5
Pages
925-935
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1993732758
Cited by
780
References
1
FWCI
25.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term outcome of EBV-specific T-cell infusions to prevent or treat EBV-related lymphoproliferative disease in transplant recipients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2009-08-239186
The paper
Heslop, H. E., Slobod, K. S., Pule, M. A., Hale, G. A., Rousseau, A., Smith, C. A., Bollard, C. M., Liu, H., Wu, M.-F., Rochester, R. J., Amrolia, P. J., Hurwitz, J. L., Brenner, M. K., & Rooney, C. M. (2010). Long-term outcome of EBV-specific T-cell infusions to prevent or treat EBV-related lymphoproliferative disease in transplant recipients. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2009-08-239186

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.