Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,104

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characterization of a rare IL-10–competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells

Open access
Iwata, Yohei, Matsushita, Takashi, Horikawa, Mayuka, DiLillo, David J., Yanaba, Koichi, Venturi, Guglielmo M., Szabolcs, Paul M., Bernstein, Steven H., Magro, Cynthia M., Williams, Armistead D., Hall, Russell P., St Clair, E. William, Tedder, Thomas F.·2011·Blood

Abstract

Regulatory B cells control inflammation and autoimmunity in mice, including the recently identified IL-10–competent B10 cell subset that represents 1% to 3% of spleen B cells. In this study, a comparable IL-10–competent B10 cell subset was characterized in human blood. B10 cells were functionally identified by their ability to express cytoplasmic IL-10 after 5 hours of ex vivo stimulation, whereas progenitor B10 (B10pro) cells required 48 hours of in vitro stimulation before they acquired the ability to express IL-10. B10 and B10pro cells represented 0.6% and approximately 5% of blood B cells, respectively. Ex vivo B10 and B10pro cells were predominantly found within the CD24hiCD27+ B-cell subpopulation that was able to negatively regulate monocyte cytokine production through IL-10–dependent pathways during in vitro functional assays. Blood B10 cells were present in 91 patients with rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, primary Sjögren syndrome, autoimmune vesiculobullous skin disease, or multiple sclerosis, and were expanded in some cases as occurs in mice with autoimmune disease. Mean B10 + B10pro-cell frequencies were also significantly higher in patients with autoimmune disease compared with healthy controls. The characterization of human B10 cells will facilitate their identification and the study of their regulatory activities during human disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2010-07-294249

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 1,104

Metadata

Authors
Iwata, Y., Matsushita, T., Horikawa, M., DiLillo, D. J., Yanaba, K., Venturi, G. M., Szabolcs, P. M., Bernstein, S. H., Magro, C. M., Williams, A. D., Hall, R. P., St Clair, E. W., & Tedder, T. F.
Venue
Blood
Published
2011-01-13
Volume
117
Issue
2
Pages
530-541
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2099443640
Cited by
1,104
References
2
FWCI
20.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characterization of a rare IL-10–competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2010-07-294249
The paper
Iwata, Y., Matsushita, T., Horikawa, M., DiLillo, D. J., Yanaba, K., Venturi, G. M., Szabolcs, P. M., Bernstein, S. H., Magro, C. M., Williams, A. D., Hall, R. P., St Clair, E. W., & Tedder, T. F. (2011). Characterization of a rare IL-10–competent B-cell subset in humans that parallels mouse regulatory B10 cells. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2010-07-294249

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.