Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 531

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation

Open access
Zamagni, Elena, Patriarca, Francesca, Nanni, Cristina, Zannetti, Beatrice, Englaro, Emanuela, Pezzi, Annalisa, Tacchetti, Paola, Buttignol, Silvia, Perrone, Giulia, Brioli, Annamaria, Pantani, Lucia, Terragna, Carolina, Carobolante, Francesca, Baccarani, Michele, Fanin, Renato, Fanti, Stefano, Cavo, Michele·2011·Blood

Abstract

We prospectively analyzed the prognostic relevance of positron emission tomography–computed tomography (PET/CT) at diagnosis, after thalidomide-dexamethasone (TD) induction therapy and double autotransplantation (ASCT) in 192 newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) patients. Presence at baseline of at least 3 focal lesions (FLs; 44% of cases), a standardized uptake value (SUV) > 4.2 (46%), and extramedullary disease (EMD; 6%) adversely affected 4-year estimates of progression-free survival (PFS; ≥ 3 FLs: 50%; SUV > 4.2: 43%; presence of EMD: 28%). SUV > 4.2 and EMD were also correlated with shorter overall survival (OS; 4-year rates: 77% and 66%, respectively). Persistence of SUV > 4.2 after TD induction was an early predictor for shorter PFS. Three months after ASCT, PET/CT was negative in 65% of patients whose 4-year rates of PFS and OS were superior to those of PET-positive patients (PFS: 66% and OS: 89%). In a multivariate analysis, both EMD and SUV > 4.2 at baseline and persistence of fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake after ASCT were independent variables adversely affecting PFS. PET/CT involvement at diagnosis, after novel agent-based induction and subsequent ASCT is a reliable predictor of prognosis in MM patients. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NTC01341262.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 531

Metadata

Authors
Zamagni, E., Patriarca, F., Nanni, C., Zannetti, B., Englaro, E., Pezzi, A., Tacchetti, P., Buttignol, S., Perrone, G., Brioli, A., Pantani, L., Terragna, C., Carobolante, F., Baccarani, M., Fanin, R., Fanti, S., & Cavo, M.
Venue
Blood
Published
2011-12-01
Volume
118
Issue
23
Pages
5989-5995
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1969552142
Cited by
531
References
0
FWCI
17.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386
The paper
Zamagni, E., Patriarca, F., Nanni, C., Zannetti, B., Englaro, E., Pezzi, A., Tacchetti, P., Buttignol, S., Perrone, G., Brioli, A., Pantani, L., Terragna, C., Carobolante, F., Baccarani, M., Fanin, R., Fanti, S., & Cavo, M. (2011). Prognostic relevance of 18-F FDG PET/CT in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with up-front autologous transplantation. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-06-361386

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.