Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 334

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia since the introduction of imatinib therapy: a single-institution historical experience

Open access
Kantarjian, Hagop, O'Brien, Susan, Jabbour, Elias, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Quintas-Cardama, Alfonso, Shan, Jenny, Rios, Mary Beth, Ravandi, Farhad, Faderl, Stefan, Kadia, Tapan, Borthakur, Gautam, Huang, Xuelin, Champlin, Richard, Talpaz, Moshe, Cortes, Jorge·2012·Blood

Abstract

A total of 1569 patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) referred to our institution within 1 month of diagnosis since 1965 were reviewed: 1148 chronic phase (CP), 175 accelerated phase (AP), and 246 blastic phase (BP). The median survival was 8.9 years in CP, 4.8 years in AP, and 6 months in BP. In CP, the 8-year survival was ≤ 15% before 1983, 42%-65% from 1983-2000, and 87% since 2001. Survival was worse in older patients (P = .004), but this was less significant since 2001 (P = .07). Survival by Sokal risk was significantly different before 2001 (P < .001), but not since 2001 (P = .4). In AP, survival improved over time (P < .001); the 8-year survival in patients treated since 2001 was 75%. Survival by age was not different in years < 2001 (P = .09), but was better since 2001 in patients ≤ 70 years of age (P = .004). In BP, the median survival improved over time (P < .001), although it has been only 7 months since 2001. In summary, survival in CML has significantly improved since 2001, particularly so in CP-AML and AP-CML. Imatinib therapy minimized the impact of known prognostic factors and Sokal risk in CP-CML and accentuated the impact of age in AP- and BP-CML.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2011-08-358135

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Cited by

See all 334

Metadata

Authors
Kantarjian, H., O'Brien, S., Jabbour, E., Garcia-Manero, G., Quintas-Cardama, A., Shan, J., Rios, M. B., Ravandi, F., Faderl, S., Kadia, T., Borthakur, G., Huang, X., Champlin, R., Talpaz, M., & Cortes, J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2012-03-01
Volume
119
Issue
9
Pages
1981-1987
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2075193502
Cited by
334
References
15
FWCI
19.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia since the introduction of imatinib therapy: a single-institution historical experience. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-08-358135
The paper
Kantarjian, H., O'Brien, S., Jabbour, E., Garcia-Manero, G., Quintas-Cardama, A., Shan, J., Rios, M. B., Ravandi, F., Faderl, S., Kadia, T., Borthakur, G., Huang, X., Champlin, R., Talpaz, M., & Cortes, J. (2012). Improved survival in chronic myeloid leukemia since the introduction of imatinib therapy: a single-institution historical experience. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-08-358135

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.