The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessment and prognostic value of the European LeukemiaNet criteria for clinicohematologic response, resistance, and intolerance to hydroxyurea in polycythemia vera
Abstract
Criteria of response and definition of resistance and intolerance to hydroxyurea (HU) in polycythemia vera (PV) were proposed by the European LeukemiaNet (ELN). Such criteria were evaluated in 261 PV patients (median follow-up, 7.2 years) treated with HU for a median of 4.4 years. Complete response, partial response, and no response were observed in 24%, 66%, and 10% of patients, respectively. Achieving ELN response (complete or partial) or hematocrit response did not result in better survival or less thrombosis and bleeding. On the contrary, having no response in leukocyte count was associated with higher risk of death (HR, 2.7; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3%-5.4%; P = .007), whereas lack of response in platelet count involved a higher risk of thrombosis and bleeding. Resistance and intolerance to HU was registered in 11% and 13% of patients, respectively. Resistance to HU was associated with higher risk of death (HR, 5.6; 95% CI, 2.7%-11.9%; P < .001) and transformation (HR, 6.8; 95% CI, 3.0%-15.4%; P < .001). In summary, fulfilling the ELN definition for response to HU was not associated with a benefit in the clinical outcome in PV, whereas response in platelet and white blood cell counts were predictive of less thrombohemorrhagic complications and better prognosis, respectively. Resistance to HU was an adverse prognostic factor.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Proportional Hazards Model for the Subdistribution of a Competing Risk
Fine, J. P., & Gray, R. J. (1999) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1999.10474144 · Cited by 14,290
Cited by
Ruxolitinib versus standard therapy for the treatment of polycythemia vera
Vannucchi, A. M., Kiladjian, J. J., Griesshammer, M., Masszi, T., Durrant, S., Passamonti, F., Harrison, C. N., Pane, F., Zachee, P., Mesa, R., et al. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1409002 · Cited by 891
Spivak, J. L. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1406186 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez-Larrán, A., Pereira, A., Cervantes, F., Arellano-Rodrigo, E., Hernández-Boluda, J.-C., Ferrer-Marín, F., Angona, A., Gómez, M., Muiña, B., Guillén, H., Teruel, A., Bellosillo, B., Burgaleta, C., Vicente, V., & Besses, C.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2012-02-09
- Volume
- 119
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1363-1369
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1980972742
- Cited by
- 234
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessment and prognostic value of the European LeukemiaNet criteria for clinicohematologic response, resistance, and intolerance to hydroxyurea in polycythemia vera. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2011-10-387787
- The paper
- Alvarez-Larrán, A., Pereira, A., Cervantes, F., Arellano-Rodrigo, E., Hernández-Boluda, J.-C., Ferrer-Marín, F., Angona, A., Gómez, M., Muiña, B., Guillén, H., Teruel, A., Bellosillo, B., Burgaleta, C., Vicente, V., & Besses, C. (2012). Assessment and prognostic value of the European LeukemiaNet criteria for clinicohematologic response, resistance, and intolerance to hydroxyurea in polycythemia vera. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2011-10-387787
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.