Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 549

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 120 of the 120 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Hematopoietic stem cells: concepts, definitions, and the new reality

Open access
Eaves, Connie J.·2015·Blood

Abstract

Hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) research took hold in the 1950s with the demonstration that intravenously injected bone marrow cells can rescue irradiated mice from lethality by reestablishing blood cell production. Attempts to quantify the cells responsible led to the discovery of serially transplantable, donor-derived, macroscopic, multilineage colonies detectable on the spleen surface 1 to 2 weeks posttransplant. The concept of self-renewing multipotent HSCs was born, but accompanied by perplexing evidence of great variability in the outcomes of HSC self-renewal divisions. The next 60 years saw an explosion in the development and use of more refined tools for assessing the behavior of prospectively purified subsets of hematopoietic cells with blood cell–producing capacity. These developments have led to the formulation of increasingly complex hierarchical models of hematopoiesis and a growing list of intrinsic and extrinsic elements that regulate HSC cycling status, viability, self-renewal, and lineage outputs. More recent examination of these properties in individual, highly purified HSCs and analyses of their perpetuation in clonally generated progeny HSCs have now provided definitive evidence of linearly transmitted heterogeneity in HSC states. These results anticipate the need and use of emerging new technologies to establish models that will accommodate such pluralistic features of HSCs and their control mechanisms.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2014-12-570200

Cites

120 of 120 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 120 references

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Jacobson, 1951, Recovery from radiation injury., Science, 113, 510, 10.1126/science.113.2940.510 · doi:10.1126/science.113.2940.510
  2. Bruce, 1966, Comparison of the sensitivity of normal hematopoietic and transplanted lymphoma colony-forming cells to chemotherapeutic agents administered in vivo., J Natl Cancer Inst, 37, 233
  3. Senn, 1967, Comparison of colony-forming ability of normal and leukaemic human marrow in cell culture., Lancet, 2, 597, 10.1016/S0140-6736(67)90742-8 · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(67)90742-8
  4. Iscove, 1970, The proliferative states of mouse granulopoietic progenitor cells., Proc Soc Exp Biol Med, 134, 33, 10.3181/00379727-134-34721 · doi:10.3181/00379727-134-34721
  5. Humphries, 1979, CFU-S in individual erythroid colonies derived in vitro from adult mouse marrow., Nature, 279, 718, 10.1038/279718a0 · doi:10.1038/279718a0

Cited by

See all 549

Metadata

Authors
Eaves, C. J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2015-04-23
Volume
125
Issue
17
Pages
2605-2613
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2069332674
Cited by
549
References
120
FWCI
40.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hematopoietic stem cells: concepts, definitions, and the new reality. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2014-12-570200
The paper
Eaves, C. J. (2015). Hematopoietic stem cells: concepts, definitions, and the new reality. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2014-12-570200

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.