Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 217

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Randomized trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Open access
Burger, Jan A., Sivina, Mariela, Jain, Nitin, Kim, Ekaterina, Kadia, Tapan, Estrov, Zeev, Nogueras-Gonzalez, Graciela M., Huang, Xuelin, Jorgensen, Jeffrey, Li, Jianling, Cheng, Mei, Clow, Fong, Ohanian, Maro, Andreeff, Michael, Mathew, Thomas, Thompson, Philip, Kantarjian, Hagop, O’Brien, Susan, Wierda, William G., Ferrajoli, Alessandra, Keating, Michael J.·2019·Blood

Abstract

Ibrutinib, an oral covalent inhibitor of Bruton’s tyrosine kinase, is an effective therapy for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). To determine whether rituximab provides added benefit to ibrutinib, we conducted a randomized single-center trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus rituximab. Patients with CLL requiring therapy were randomized to receive 28-day cycles of once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg, either as a single agent (n = 104), or together with rituximab (375 mg/m2; n = 104), given weekly during cycle 1, then once per cycle until cycle 6. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) in the intention-to-treat population. We enrolled 208 patients with CLL, 181 with relapsed CLL and 27 treatment-naive patients with high-risk disease (17p deletion or TP53 mutation). After a median follow-up of 36 months, the Kaplan-Meier estimates of PFS were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI], 76.6-91.9) for patients receiving ibrutinib, and 86.9% (95% CI, 77.3-92.6) for patients receiving ibrutinib plus rituximab. Similarly, response rates were the same in both arms (overall response rate, 92%). However, time to normalization of peripheral blood lymphocyte counts and time to complete remission were shorter, and residual disease levels in the bone marrow were lower, in patients receiving ibrutinib plus rituximab. We conclude that the addition of rituximab to ibrutinib in relapsed and treatment-naive high-risk patients with CLL failed to show improvement in PFS. However, patients treated with ibrutinib plus rituximab reached their remissions faster and achieved significantly lower residual disease levels. Given these results, ibrutinib as single-agent therapy remains current standard-of-care treatment in CLL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02007044.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2018-10-879429

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 217

Metadata

Authors
Burger, J. A., Sivina, M., Jain, N., Kim, E., Kadia, T., Estrov, Z., Nogueras-Gonzalez, G. M., Huang, X., Jorgensen, J., Li, J., Cheng, M., Clow, F., Ohanian, M., Andreeff, M., Mathew, T., Thompson, P., Kantarjian, H., O’Brien, S., Wierda, W. G., Ferrajoli, A., & Keating, M. J.
Venue
Blood
Published
2019-03-07
Volume
133
Issue
10
Pages
1011-1019
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2886452066
Cited by
217
References
5
FWCI
14.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood-2018-10-879429
The paper
Burger, J. A., Sivina, M., Jain, N., Kim, E., Kadia, T., Estrov, Z., Nogueras-Gonzalez, G. M., Huang, X., Jorgensen, J., Li, J., Cheng, M., Clow, F., Ohanian, M., Andreeff, M., Mathew, T., Thompson, P., Kantarjian, H., O’Brien, S., Wierda, W. G., . . . Keating, M. J. (2019). Randomized trial of ibrutinib vs ibrutinib plus rituximab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood-2018-10-879429

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.