Cited by 8Blood transfusion and managementClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlBlood donation and transfusion practices

Small-Volume Tubes to Reduce Anemia and Transfusion (STRATUS): A Pragmatic Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial

Siegal, Deborah M, Belley-Cote, Emilie, Arnold, Donald M., D'Aragon, Frederick, Stephen, Hill, Lee, Shun Fu, Pinto, Tara, Rochwerg, Bram +3 more·2019·Blood

Abstract

Background: Intensive care unit (ICU) patients undergo frequent blood sampling for laboratory testing resulting in blood loss that contributes to anemia and red blood cell (RBC) transfusion. Only 10% of the blood collected is used for testing suggesting that lower sample volumes may reduce the incidence/severity of anemia and use of RBC transfusion without compromising care. Small-volume (soft-draw) Vacutainer® tubes for blood collection (2-3 mL) have the same cost, physical dimensions, and blood draw technique as standard-volume tubes (4-10 mL) and are compatible with laboratory analyzers. We previously conducted a mixed-methods pilot study (n=369) in which small-volume tubes were implemented in the ICU resulting in a 45% reduction in blood loss with acceptability to end-users and no increased frequency of inadequate samples. We are currently conducting the STRATUS trial, a multi-center stepped wedge cluster randomized trial to determine whether a policy of using small-volume blood collection tubes reduces RBC transfusion compared to standard-volume tubes in adult ICU patients. Using this design an intervention can be incorporated into everyday practice at a site of care (such as an ICU) where individual randomization is not feasible. It is ideal for studying the effectiveness and implementation of interventions that have a high likelihood of benefit and low risk of harm. Study Design and Methods: STRATUS is a pragmatic stepped wedge cluster randomized trial being conducted at 25 ICUs (clusters) in Canada over 18 months. At 6-week intervals (steps), 2 ICUs are randomly selected to switch from standard-volume tubes (control) to small-volume tubes (intervention) for blood sampling. All patients admitted to the ICU during the study period are enrolled with waived consent and undergo blood sampling using the allocated tubes. To be eligible for STRATUS, ICUs met the following criteria: (i) adult care only (≥18 years), (ii) unit size ≥14 beds, (iii) capacity for mechanical ventilation; (iv) use of standard-volume Vacutainer® blood collection tubes at baseline; and (v) availability of electronic administrative and laboratory information. The primary outcome is the number of RBC units transfused per patient during their ICU stay in patients admitted to ICU for ≥48 hours. Secondary outcomes include (i) number of RBC units transfused per patient for the entire cohort, (ii) percentage change in estimated blood loss; (iii) change in hemoglobin concentration from ICU admission to discharge adjusted for RBC transfusion; (iv) number of samples with inadequate volume for testing; (v) ICU and hospital mortality; and (vi) ICU and hospital length of stay. The study is approved by local and provincial research ethics boards. Data are collected from electronic administrative and health record sources. Assuming a power of 90% with a type I error of 5% (2-sided) and intra-cluster correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.01, 25 sites with 729 patients per site (total 18,240 ICU patients) are required to detect a minimum difference of 5 units per 100 patients (or 2.5% reduction). As the interventions are applied in hospital, we expect minimal loss to follow-up. From trial initiation January 2, 2019 to August 1, 2019, 6 sites have been switched to small-volume blood collection tubes on schedule. Up to May 2, 2019 enrolment was 4,186 patients. Significance: STRATUS will determine whether the use of small-volume blood collection tubes reduces RBC transfusion in ICU patients using an innovative cluster trial design that incorporates the intervention into routine ICU practice. With electronic administrative and health record data collection and a clinically relevant primary outcome, this pragmatic trial has the potential to change blood collection practices widely. Disclosures Siegal: Portola: Honoraria; BMS-Pfizer: Honoraria; Novartis: Honoraria; Bayer: Honoraria; Leo Pharma: Honoraria; Aspen Pharma: Honoraria. Arnold:Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Rigel: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Principia: Consultancy. Connolly:Bayer Healthcare: Consultancy, Research Funding; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Portola Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Research Funding; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Research Funding. Crowther:Octapharma: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Shionogi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Alexion: Speakers Bureau; Asahi Kasei: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; CSL Behring: Other: preparing educational material and/or providing educational presentations; Pfizer: Other: preparing educational material and/or providing educational presentations; Servier Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; BMS Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Bayer:

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2019-130257

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Siegal, D. M., Belley-Cote, E., Arnold, D. M., D'Aragon, F., Stephen, H., Lee, S. F., Pinto, T., Rochwerg, B., Connolly, S. J., Zarychanski, R., & Crowther, M.
Affiliations
  • Population Health Research Institute (CA)
  • Population Health Research Institute, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Canada
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
Venue
Blood
Published
2019-11-13
Volume
134
Issue
Supplement_1
Pages
3685-3685
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2985202786
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2
Type
conference abstract
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Blood (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Blood transfusion and management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Blood donation and transfusion practices
Keywords
red blood cell transfusion, anemia, blood loss, intensive care unit patients, blood sampling, Vacutainer tubes, hemoglobin levels, transfusion policy, intervention implementation, stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review