The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Immuno-PRISM: A Randomized Phase II Platform Study of Bispecific Antibodies in High-Risk Smoldering Myeloma
Abstract
Background: B-cell Maturation antigen-directed immunotherapies have demonstrated significant efficacy in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), with recent approval of the bispecific antibody teclistamab (TEC) . However, the use of immunotherapy in high-risk smoldering myeloma (HR-SMM) has not been examined to date. We hypothesized that bispecific antibody therapy would have greater benefit in HR-SMM due to this population having a more intact immune system, lower disease burden and may therefore have a higher efficacy and less toxicity compared to RRMM. Based on previous studies of lenalidomide and dexamethasone demonstrating benefit in HR-SMM, the Immuno-PRISM trial is studying various bispecific antibodies against a control arm of lenalidomide and dexamethasone. Herein, we report our first results of TEC in HR-SMM. Methods: This is a multiple arm, randomized, phase II, platform study evaluating TEC vs lenalidomide and dexamethasone in HR-SMM. Eligibility criteria included HR-SMM per Mayo 2018 “20-2-20” model, total IMWG risk score of 9 or greater, and other previously established high-risk criteria including PETHEMA criteria, evolving-type SMM, and high-risk FISH abnormalities. This study has an initial, safety run-in cohort of 6 patients treated with TEC. All patients receive 2 step-up doses of subcutaneous TEC. In the safety run-in, patients receive a dose lower than the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TEC. If no dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) are observed,…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Three interventional clinical trials with excellent outcomes and MRD negativity were recently investigated using next-generation sequencing.
“Three different interventional clinical trials reporting excellent results in terms of outcomes and measurable residual disease (MRD) negative status have been recently investigated by using next-generation sequencing.109,110,114,115”
From Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective (2026) · cites this paper as [114]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Evolution of Multiple Myeloma from a Genomic Perspective
Maura, F., Samur, M., & Munshi, N. (2026) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.2024026313 · Cited by 8
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Nadeem, O., Magidson, S., Midha, S., O'Donnell, E. K., Hartley-Brown, M. A., Sperling, A. S., Redd, R. A., Marto, M., Davie, C., Ricciardi, C., Choden, D., Strutevant, A., Alberti, J., Mo, C. C., Laubach, J., Richardson, P. G., Anderson, K. C., Munshi, N. C., Trippa, L., & Ghobrial, I. M.
- Affiliations
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
- 1Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- 2DFCI, Boston, MA
- Harvard University (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2023-11-02
- Volume
- 142
- Issue
- Supplement 1
- Pages
- 206-206
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W4389231688
- Cited by
- 37
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13
- Type
- conference abstract
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Blood (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
- Keywords
- high-risk smoldering myeloma, bispecific antibodies, teclistamab, BCMA, complete response rate, progression-free survival, minimal residual disease negativity, dose-limiting toxicity, subcutaneous administration, stem cell collection, immunological markers, platform trials
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review