Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 283

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults

Open access
Goyal, Gaurav, Tazi, Abdellatif, Go, Ronald S., Rech, Karen L., Picarsic, Jennifer L., Vassallo, Robert, Young, Jason R., Cox, Christian W., Van Laar, Jan, Hermiston, Michelle L., Cao, Xin-Xin, Makras, Polyzois, Kaltsas, Gregory, Haroche, Julien, Collin, Matthew, McClain, Kenneth L., Diamond, Eli L., Girschikofsky, Michael·2022·Blood

Abstract

Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) can affect children and adults with a wide variety of clinical manifestations, including unifocal, single-system multifocal, single-system pulmonary (smoking-associated), or multisystem disease. The existing paradigms in the management of LCH in adults are mostly derived from the pediatric literature. Over the last decade, the discovery of clonality and MAPK-ERK pathway mutations in most cases led to the recognition of LCH as a hematopoietic neoplasm, opening the doors for treatment with targeted therapies. These advances have necessitated an update of the existing recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of LCH in adults. This document presents consensus recommendations that resulted from the discussions at the annual Histiocyte Society meeting in 2019, encompassing clinical features, classification, diagnostic criteria, treatment algorithm, and response assessment for adults with LCH. The recommendations favor the use of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-based imaging for staging and response assessment in the majority of cases. Most adults with unifocal disease may be cured by local therapies, while the first-line treatment for single-system pulmonary LCH remains smoking cessation. Among patients not amenable or unresponsive to these treatments and/or have multifocal and multisystem disease, systemic treatments are recommended. Preferred systemic treatments in adults with LCH include cladribine or cytarabine, with the emerging role of targeted (BRAF and MEK inhibitor) therapies. Despite documented responses to treatments, many patients struggle with a high symptom burden from pain, fatigue, and mood disorders that should be acknowledged and managed appropriately.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.2021014343

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 69 references

Metadata

Authors
Goyal, G., Tazi, A., Go, R. S., Rech, K. L., Picarsic, J. L., Vassallo, R., Young, J. R., Cox, C. W., Van Laar, J., Hermiston, M. L., Cao, X.-X., Makras, P., Kaltsas, G., Haroche, J., Collin, M., McClain, K. L., Diamond, E. L., & Girschikofsky, M.
Venue
Blood
Published
2022-04-28
Volume
139
Issue
17
Pages
2601-2621
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W4220820793
Cited by
283
References
69
FWCI
28.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: International expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.2021014343
The paper
Goyal, G., Tazi, A., Go, R. S., Rech, K. L., Picarsic, J. L., Vassallo, R., Young, J. R., Cox, C. W., Van Laar, J., Hermiston, M. L., Cao, X.-X., Makras, P., Kaltsas, G., Haroche, J., Collin, M., McClain, K. L., Diamond, E. L., & Girschikofsky, M. (2022). International expert consensus recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Langerhans cell histiocytosis in adults. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.2021014343

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.