Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 183

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Results of Intensive Chemotherapy in 998 Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome - Predictive Prognostic Models for Outcome.

Jabbour, Elias, Kantarjian, Hagop, O’Brien, Susan, Cortes, Jorge, Giles, Francis, Faderl, Stefan, Garcia-Manero, Guillermo, Wierda, William, Pierce, Sherry, Shan, Jianqin, Estey, Elihu·2005·Blood

Abstract

Background. Elderly patients (age ≥ 65 years) with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) have a poor prognosis. AML-type therapy results are often derived from studies in younger patients and may not apply to elderly AML. Many investigators and oncologists advocate, at times, only supportive care or frontline single agents, phase I–II studies, low intensity regimens, or “targeted” therapies. Baseline expectations for outcomes of elderly AML with “standard” AML-type therapy are not well defined. Study Aims. To develop prognostic models for complete response (CR), induction (8-week) mortality, and survival rates in elderly AML, which define expectations with standard AML type therapy. Patients and Methods. 998 patients age ≥ 65 years with AML or high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (≥ 10% blasts) treated with intensive chemotherapy between 1980 and 2004 were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors used standard methods. Results. The overall CR rate was 45% and induction mortality 29%. Multivariate analyses identified consistent independent poor prognostic factors for CR, 8-week mortality, and survival. These included age ≥ 75 years, unfavorable karyotypes (often complex), poor performance (3–4 ECOG), longer duration of antecedent hematologic disorder, treatment outside the laminar airflow room, and abnormal organ functions. Patients could be divided into: 1) a favorable group (about 20% of patients) with expected CR rates above 60%, induction mortality rates below 10%, and 1-year survival rates above 50%; 2) an intermediate group (about 50% of patients) with expected CR rates of 50%, induction mortality rates of 30%, and 1-year survival rates of 30%; and 3) an unfavorable risk group (about 25% to 30% of patients) with expected CR rates of less than 20%, induction mortality rates above 50%, and 1-year survival rates of less than 10%. Conclusions. Prognostic models were developed for elderly patients with AML, which may assist in therapeutic and investigational decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v106.11.1846.1846

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 183

Metadata

Authors
Jabbour, E., Kantarjian, H., O’Brien, S., Cortes, J., Giles, F., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Wierda, W., Pierce, S., Shan, J., & Estey, E.
Venue
Blood
Published
2005-11-16
Volume
106
Issue
11
Pages
1846-1846
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2526458734
Cited by
183
References
0
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Results of Intensive Chemotherapy in 998 Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome - Predictive Prognostic Models for Outcome. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v106.11.1846.1846
The paper
Jabbour, E., Kantarjian, H., O’Brien, S., Cortes, J., Giles, F., Faderl, S., Garcia-Manero, G., Wierda, W., Pierce, S., Shan, J., & Estey, E. (2005). Results of Intensive Chemotherapy in 998 Patients Aged 65 Years or Older with Acute Myeloid Leukemia or High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome - Predictive Prognostic Models for Outcome. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v106.11.1846.1846

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.