Cited by 1,165Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesChronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments

International phase 3 study of azacitidine vs conventional care regimens in older patients with newly diagnosed AML with >30% blasts

Open access
Dombret, Hervé, Seymour, John F., Butrym, Aleksandra, Wierzbowska, Agnieszka, Selleslag, Dominik, Jang, Jun Ho, Kumar, Rajat, Cavenagh, James +16 more·2015·Blood

Abstract

Key Points: Azacitidine increased median overall survival by 3.8 months vs current commonly used AML treatments (10.4 vs 6.5 months; P = .1009). Azacitidine safety in patients age ≥65 years with AML (>30% blasts) was consistent with its known safety profile in other trials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2015-01-621664

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prolonged time to initial response, typically around 3 months from treatment onset, is consistent with the primary effects of low dose treatment being mediated via DNA demethylation and epigenetic reprogramming as opposed to direct cytotoxicity.

    “The prolonged time to initial response, which typically occurs around 3 months from treatment onset 125 , is consistent with the primary effects of low dose treatment being mediated via DNA demethylation and epigenetic reprogramming as opposed to direct cytotoxicity 126-128 .”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dombret, H., Seymour, J. F., Butrym, A., Wierzbowska, A., Selleslag, D., Jang, J. H., Kumar, R., Cavenagh, J., Schuh, A. C., Candoni, A., Récher, C., Sandhu, I., Bernal del Castillo, T., Al-Ali, H. K., Martinelli, G., Falantes, J., Noppeney, R., Stone, R. M., Minden, M. D., McIntyre, H., Songer, S., Lucy, L. M., Beach, C. L., & Döhner, H.
Affiliations
  • Hôpital Saint-Louis (FR)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
  • Medical University of Lodz (PL)
  • Algemeen Ziekenhuis Sint-Jan, Brugge, Belgium;
  • Samsung Medical Center (KR)
  • CancerCare Manitoba (CA)
  • National Health Service (GB)
  • Princess Margaret Cancer Centre (CA)
  • Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT)
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse (FR)
  • Alberta Hospital Edmonton (CA)
  • Hospital Central de Asturias, Oviedo, Spain;
  • Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany;
  • University of Bologna (IT)
  • Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (ES)
  • Essen University Hospital (DE)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • Celgene (United States) (US)
  • University Hospital Ulm (DE)
Venue
Blood
Published
2015-07-16
Volume
126
Issue
3
Pages
291-299
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W1600365609
Cited by
1,165
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 131 · 2022: 137 · 2021: 153 · 2020: 134 · 2019: 112 · 2018: 99 · 2017: 104 · 2016: 81 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 1
FWCI
81.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio istituzionale della ricerca (Alma Mater Studiorum Università di Bologna) (submittedVersion)
  • Consultation of the Doctoral Thesis Database (TESEO) (Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
Keywords
azacitidine, acute myeloid leukemia, elderly patients, newly diagnosed AML, overall survival, induction chemotherapy, supportive care, adverse events, subgroup analysis
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Azacitidine, Blast Crisis, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, International Agencies, Male, Neoplasm Staging, Prognosis, Prospective Studies, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Survival Rate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review