Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 199

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Separation of functionally distinct human granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factors

Nicola, NA, Metcalf, D, Johnson, GR, Burgess, AW·1979·Blood

Abstract

Human placental conditioned medium (HPCM) contans colony-stimulating factors (CSFs) required for the growth in vitro of neutrophilic granulocyte-macrophage (GM) and eosinophilic (EO) progenitor cells from human bone marrow. Fractionation of CSFs in HPCM was achieved by manipulation of the elution conditions on a column of phenyl-Sepharose. After equilibration of the phenyl-Sepharose column at high ionic strength (1 M ammonium sulfate), all of the CSF bound; one species of GM-CSF (alpha) and all of the elutable EO-CSF were eluted from the column simply by reducing the salt concentration, whereas the second species of GM-CSF (beta) was free of EO-CSF and was eluted only by increasing the concentration of tehylene glycol in the elution buffer. The two GM-CSFs were functionally distinct. GM-CSF alpha preferentially stimulated colony formation by day 14 of culture, and there was a decreased proportion of neutrophil colonies and increased proportion of macrophage colonies as the strength of the stimulus was decreased; GM- CSF beta, on the other hand, preferentially stimulated colony formation by day 7 of culture, and the proportion of neutrophil colonies was high (average 80%) and independent of the concentration of GM-CSF beta. GM- CSF alpha and GM-CSF beta were indistinguishable on the basis of apparent molecular size on tel filtration columns (molecular weight 30,000), charge properties on isoelectric focusing beds (isoelectric point, 4.9), and were not related to each other as a sialoglycoprotein is related to its asialo form. Adherent cell removal of the target bone marrow cells (to remove colony-stimulating cells) suggested that both GM-CSFs acted directly rather than by stimulating the production of GM- CSF. Mixing and titration experiments indicated that the differences in functional specificities of the two GM-CSFs (and the lack of EO-CSF associated with GM-CSF beta) were not due to the presence of specific inhibitory molecules or lower absolute levels of CSF in one fraction relative to the other. These two species of GM-CSF should be useful in separately enumerating subpopulations of different GM-progenitor cells inhuman hemopoietic disorders.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v54.3.614.614

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Nicola, N., Metcalf, D., Johnson, G., & Burgess, A.
Venue
Blood
Published
1979-09-01
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
614-627
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2366128456
Cited by
199
References
0
FWCI
6.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Separation of functionally distinct human granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factors. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v54.3.614.614
The paper
Nicola, N., Metcalf, D., Johnson, G., & Burgess, A. (1979). Separation of functionally distinct human granulocyte-macrophage colony- stimulating factors. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v54.3.614.614

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.