The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Methotrexate and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of a controlled trial
Abstract
Patients with acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia (ANL) in first remission (n = 38) or chronic myelocytic leukemia (CML) (n = 55) were given cyclophosphamide and total body irradiation, followed by marrow infusion from HLA-identical siblings. To evaluate postgrafting prophylaxis for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), the patients were randomized to receive either methotrexate and cyclosporine (n = 43) or cyclosporine alone (n = 50). Methotrexate/cyclosporine significantly reduced the incidence and severity of acute GVHD, and improved early survival. This report updates the results with a 3.0 to 4.5 year follow-up. Methotrexate/cyclosporine did not interfere with sustained hematopoietic engraftment, although granulocyte recovery to 1,000/microL was delayed by five days on the average. The incidence of chronic GVHD was identical in the two groups (26% v 24%). Disease-free 3-year survival was slightly better in the methotrexate/cyclosporine group (65% v 54%), but this benefit was restricted to patients with CML (73% v 54%), while no improvement was seen in patients with ANL (41% v 41%). In contrast to patients with CML (relapse rates 8% v 9%), the early survival benefit among patients with ANL given methotrexate/cyclosporine was offset by an increase in leukemic relapses (29% v 16%).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hematopoietic Stem-Cell Transplantation
Copelan, E. A. (2006) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra052638 · Cited by 2,522
Translating Stem and Progenitor Cell Biology to the Clinic: Barriers and Opportunities
Weissman, I. L. (2000) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.287.5457.1442 · Cited by 852
CD4+CD25+ Immunoregulatory T Cells
Cohen, J. L., Trenado, A., Vasey, D., Klatzmann, D., & Salomon, B. L. (2002) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20020090 · Cited by 687
Reusser, P., Riddell, Sr., Meyers, J., & Greenberg, P. (1991) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v78.5.1373.1373 · Cited by 666
Pepe, M. S., & Mori, M. (1993) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780120803 · Cited by 620
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Storb, R., Deeg, H., Pepe, M., Appelbaum, F., Anasetti, C., Beatty, P., Bensinger, W., Berenson, R., Buckner, C., & Clift, R.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1989-05-01
- Volume
- 73
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1729-1734
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W1934171667
- Cited by
- 432
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Methotrexate and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of a controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v73.6.1729.1729
- The paper
- Storb, R., Deeg, H., Pepe, M., Appelbaum, F., Anasetti, C., Beatty, P., Bensinger, W., Berenson, R., Buckner, C., & Clift, R. (1989). Methotrexate and cyclosporine versus cyclosporine alone for prophylaxis of graft-versus-host disease in patients given HLA-identical marrow grafts for leukemia: long-term follow-up of a controlled trial. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v73.6.1729.1729
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.