The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group
Abstract
Previously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7–3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7–3–7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5–2 or 5–2–5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7– 3 and 59% of 7–3–7 patients; 7–3–7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7–3 and 18 months for 7–3–7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7–3 and 27 months for 7–3–7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7–3–7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7–3 as compared with 17 months for 7–3–7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7–3–7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7–3 and 15 days for 7–3–7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5–2–5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
A randomized study of high-dose cytarabine in induction in acute myeloid leukemia [see comments]
Bishop, J., Matthews, J., Young, G., Szer, J., Gillett, A., Joshua, D., Bradstock, K., Enno, A., Wolf, M., & Fox, R. (1996) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood.v87.5.1710.1710 · Cited by 458
Self-citationCPX-351 in acute myeloid leukemia: can a new formulation maximize the efficacy of old compounds?
Brunetti, C., Anelli, L., Zagaria, A., Specchia, G., & Albano, F. (2017) · Expert Review of Hematology · doi:10.1080/17474086.2017.1369400 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Bishop, J., Lowenthal, R., Joshua, D., Matthews, J., Todd, D., Cobcroft, R., Whiteside, M., Kronenberg, H., Ma, D., & Dodds, A.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 1990-01-01
- Volume
- 75
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-32
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W118967028
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 5.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v75.1.27.27
- The paper
- Bishop, J., Lowenthal, R., Joshua, D., Matthews, J., Todd, D., Cobcroft, R., Whiteside, M., Kronenberg, H., Ma, D., & Dodds, A. (1990). Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v75.1.27.27
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.