Cited by 4,427Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processesHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

International Scoring System for Evaluating Prognosis in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Open access

Abstract

Despite multiple disparate prognostic risk analysis systems for evaluating clinical outcome for patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), imprecision persists with such analyses. To attempt to improve on these systems, an International MDS Risk Analysis Workshop combined cytogenetic, morphological, and clinical data from seven large previously reported risk-based studies that had generated prognostic systems. A global analysis was performed on these patients, and critical prognostic variables were re-evaluated to generate a consensus prognostic system, particularly using a more refined bone marrow (BM) cytogenetic classification. Univariate analysis indicated that the major variables having an impact on disease outcome for evolution to acute myeloid leukemia were cytogenetic abnormalities, percentage of BM myeloblasts, and number of cytopenias; for survival, in addition to the above, variables also included age and gender. Cytogenetic subgroups of outcome were as follows: “good” outcomes were normal, −Y alone, del(5q) alone, del(20q) alone; “poor” outcomes were complex (ie, ≥3 abnormalities) or chromosome 7 anomalies; and “intermediate” outcomes were other abnormalities. Multivariate analysis combined these cytogenetic subgroups with percentage of BM blasts and number of cytopenias to generate a prognostic model. Weighting these variables by their statistical power separated patients into distinctive subgroups of risk for 25% of patients to undergo evolution to acute myeloid leukemia, with: low (31% of patients), 9.4 years; intermediate-1 (INT-1; 39%), 3.3 years; INT-2 (22%), 1.1 years; and high (8%), 0.2 year. These features also separated patients into similar distinctive risk groups for median survival: low, 5.7 years; INT-1, 3.5 years; INT-2, 1.2 years; and high, 0.4 year. Stratification for age further improved analysis of survival. Compared with prior risk-based classifications, this International Prognostic Scoring System provides an improved method for evaluating prognosis in MDS. This classification system should prove useful for more precise design and analysis of therapeutic trials in this disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v89.6.2079

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 33 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Greenberg, P., Cox, C., LeBeau, M. M., Fenaux, P., Morel, P., Sanz, G., Sanz, M., Vallespi, T., Hamblin, T., Oscier, D., Ohyashiki, K., Toyama, K., Aul, C., Mufti, G., & Bennett, J.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Medical University (JP)
  • From the Hematology Divisions of Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA; the Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY; the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Lille, France; Hospital La Fe, Valencia, Spain; Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; the Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK; the Tokyo Medical College, Tokyo, Japan; the Heinrich Heine University, Dusseldorf, Germany; and the King's College Hospital, London, UK.
Venue
Blood
Published
1997-03-15
Volume
89
Issue
6
Pages
2079-2088
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W187238933
Cited by
4,427
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 69 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 124 · 2022: 131 · 2021: 155 · 2020: 167 · 2019: 144 · 2018: 174 · 2017: 226 · 2016: 183 · 2015: 205 · 2014: 232 · 2013: 253 · 2012: 256
FWCI
36.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Keywords
myelodysplastic syndrome, prognostic score, International Prognostic Scoring System, risk stratification, bone marrow cytogenetics, acute myeloid leukemia transformation, bone marrow blasts, cytopenia, survival, del(5q), del(20q)
MeSH terms
Acute Disease, Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Bone Marrow, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Leukemia, Myeloid, Male, Middle Aged, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Prognosis, Sex Factors, Multivariate Analysis, Survival Analysis, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review