The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Wound-healing defects in mice lacking fibrinogen
Abstract
In addition to its key role in the control of blood loss following injury, fibrin(ogen) has been proposed to play an important role in tissue repair by providing an initial matrix that can stabilize wound fields and support local cell proliferation and migration. To test directly these concepts, the effect of fibrinogen deficiency on cutaneous tissue repair in mice was investigated using incisional and excisional wounds. The time required to overtly heal wounds was similar in fibrinogen-deficient and control mice, but histologic evaluation revealed distinct differences in the repair process, including an altered pattern of epithelial cell migration and increased epithelial hyperplasia. Furthermore, granulation tissue in fibrinogen-deficient mice failed to adequately close the wound gap, resulting in persistent open wounds or partially covered sinus tracts. The tensile strength of these wounds was also reduced compared with control mice. The most profound defect in wound tissue organization was observed in fibrinogen-deficient mice following the subcutaneous implantation of a porous tubing chamber. Cells migrated into the wall of the implants at a similar rate as control mice, but cells from fibrinogen-deficient animals were unable to efficiently organize and migrate into wound fluid-filled dead space within the center of the implants. These studies show that re-epithelialization, granulation tissue formation, including the establishment of neovasculature, and the formation of fibrotic scar tissue can proceed in the absence of fibrin(ogen) and all of its proteolytic derivatives. However, fibrin (ogen) is important for appropriate cellular migration and organization within wound fields and in initially establishing wound strength and stability. (Blood. 2001;97:3691-3698)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fibronectin matrix deposition and fibronectin receptor expression in healing and normal skin
Clark, R. A. F. (1990) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1111/1523-1747.ep12876104 · Cited by 312
Cited by
Cancer as an overhealing wound: an old hypothesis revisited
Schäfer, M., & Werner, S. (2008) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm2455 · Cited by 956
Weisel, J. W. (2005) · Advances in Protein Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0065-3233(05)70008-5 · Cited by 816
Sell, S. A., Wolfe, P. S., Garg, K., McCool, J. M., Rodriguez, I. A., & Bowlin, G. L. (2010) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym2040522 · Cited by 578
Dobaczewski, M., Gonzalez-Quesada, C., & Frangogiannis, N. G. (2010) · Journal of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.07.015 · Cited by 548
Potential cellular and molecular causes of hypertrophic scar formation
van der Veer, W. M., Bloemen, M. C. T., Ulrich, M. M. W., Molema, G., van Zuijlen, P. P., Middelkoop, E., & Niessen, F. B. (2009) · Burns · doi:10.1016/j.burns.2008.06.020 · Cited by 353
Metadata
- Authors
- Drew, A. F.
- Venue
- Blood
- Publisher
- American Society of Hematology
- Published
- 2001-06-15
- Volume
- 97
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3691-3698
- ISSN
- 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
- 1528-0020
- OpenAlex
- W2068440683
- Cited by
- 198
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Wound-healing defects in mice lacking fibrinogen. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v97.12.3691
- The paper
- Drew, A. F. (2001). Wound-healing defects in mice lacking fibrinogen. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v97.12.3691
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.