Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 699

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Infusion of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific T cells for the treatment of CMV infection not responding to antiviral chemotherapy

Einsele, Hermann, Roosnek, Eddy, Rufer, Nathalie, Sinzger, Christian, Riegler, Susanne, Löffler, Jürgen, Grigoleit, Ulrich, Moris, Arnaud, Rammensee, Hans-Georg, Kanz, Lothar, Kleihauer, Annette, Frank, Friederike, Jahn, Gerhard, Hebart, Holger·2002·Blood

Abstract

We adoptively transferred donor-derived cytomegalovirus (CMV)-specific T-cell lines into 8 stem cell transplant recipients lacking CMV-specific T-cell proliferation. All patients, of whom one was infected by a CMV strain that was genotypically ganciclovir resistant, had received unsuccessful antiviral chemotherapy for more than 4 weeks. CMV-specific lines had been prepared by repetitive stimulation with CMV antigen, which increased the percentage of CMV-specific T cells and ablated alloreactivity completely even against patients mismatched for 1 to 3 HLA antigens. After transfer of 107 T cells/m2 at a median of 120 days (range, 79-479 days) after transplantation, no side effects were noticed. Despite cessation of antiviral chemotherapy, the CMV load dropped significantly in all 7 evaluable patients, with a maximal reduction after a median of 20 days (range, 5-31 days). In 2 patients with high virus load, the antiviral effect was only transient. One of these patients received a second T-cell infusion, which cleared the virus completely. At a median of 11 days after transfer, CMV-specific T-cell proliferation was demonstrated in 6 patients, and an increase in CMV-specific CD4+ T cells was demonstrated in 5 patients. In 6 patients, 1.12 to 41 CMV-specific CD8+ T cells/μL blood were detected at a median of 13 days after transfer, with an increase in all patients lacking CMV-specific CD8+ T cells prior to transfer. Hence, anti-CMV cellular therapy was successful in 5 of 7 patients, whereas in 2 of 7 patients, who received an intensified immune suppression at the time of or after T-cell therapy, only transient reductions in virus load were obtained.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.v99.11.3916

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 699

Metadata

Authors
Einsele, H., Roosnek, E., Rufer, N., Sinzger, C., Riegler, S., Löffler, J., Grigoleit, U., Moris, A., Rammensee, H.-G., Kanz, L., Kleihauer, A., Frank, F., Jahn, G., & Hebart, H.
Venue
Blood
Published
2002-06-01
Volume
99
Issue
11
Pages
3916-3922
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2119627739
Cited by
699
References
20
FWCI
27.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Infusion of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific T cells for the treatment of CMV infection not responding to antiviral chemotherapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/blood.v99.11.3916
The paper
Einsele, H., Roosnek, E., Rufer, N., Sinzger, C., Riegler, S., Löffler, J., Grigoleit, U., Moris, A., Rammensee, H.-G., Kanz, L., Kleihauer, A., Frank, F., Jahn, G., & Hebart, H. (2002). Infusion of cytomegalovirus (CMV)–specific T cells for the treatment of CMV infection not responding to antiviral chemotherapy. Blood. https://doi.org/10.1182/blood.v99.11.3916

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.