Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 200

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

TP53 mutation defines a unique subgroup within complex karyotype de novo and therapy-related MDS/AML

Open access
Weinberg, Olga K., Siddon, Alexa, Madanat, Yazan F., Gagan, Jeffrey, Arber, Daniel A., Dal Cin, Paola, Narayanan, Damodaran, Ouseph, Madhu M., Kurzer, Jason H., Hasserjian, Robert P.·2022·Blood Advances

Abstract

A subset of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) show complex karyotype (CK), and these cases include a relatively high proportion of cases of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms and TP53 mutations. We aimed to evaluate the clinicopathologic features of outcome of 299 AML and MDS patients with CK collected from multiple academic institutions. Mutations were present in 287 patients (96%), and the most common mutation detected was in TP53 gene (247, 83%). A higher frequency of TP53 mutations was present in therapy-related cases (P = .008), with a trend for worse overall survival (OS) in therapy-related patients as compared with de novo disease (P = .08) and within the therapy-related group; the presence of TP53 mutation strongly predicted for worse outcome (P = .0017). However, there was no difference in survival between CK patients based on categorization of AML vs MDS (P = .96) or presence of absence of circulating blasts ≥1% (P = .52). TP53-mutated patients presented with older age (P = .06) and lower hemoglobin levels (P = .004) and marrow blast counts (P = .02) compared with those with CK lacking TP53 mutation. Multivariable analysis identified presence of multihit TP53 mutation as strongest predictor of worse outcome, whereas neither a diagnosis of AML vs MDS nor therapy-relatedness independently influenced OS. Our findings suggest that among patients with MDS and AML, the presence of TP53 mutation (in particular multihit TP53 mutation) in the context of CK identifies a homogeneously aggressive disease, irrespective of the blast count at presentation or therapy-relatedness. The current classification of these cases into different disease categories artificially separates a single biologic disease entity.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006239

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 200

Metadata

Authors
Weinberg, O. K., Siddon, A., Madanat, Y. F., Gagan, J., Arber, D. A., Dal Cin, P., Narayanan, D., Ouseph, M. M., Kurzer, J. H., & Hasserjian, R. P.
Venue
Blood Advances
Published
2022-05-05
Volume
6
Issue
9
Pages
2847-2853
ISSN
  • 2473-9529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-9537
OpenAlex
W4210791570
Cited by
200
References
3
FWCI
26.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: TP53 mutation defines a unique subgroup within complex karyotype de novo and therapy-related MDS/AML. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006239
The paper
Weinberg, O. K., Siddon, A., Madanat, Y. F., Gagan, J., Arber, D. A., Dal Cin, P., Narayanan, D., Ouseph, M. M., Kurzer, J. H., & Hasserjian, R. P. (2022). TP53 mutation defines a unique subgroup within complex karyotype de novo and therapy-related MDS/AML. Blood Advances. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006239

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.