Cited by 23Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchChronic Myeloid Leukemia TreatmentsRetinoids in leukemia and cellular processes

Evidence-based risk stratification of myeloid neoplasms harboring TP53 mutations

Open access
Shah, Mithun Vinod, Hung, Kevin, Baranwal, Anmol, Kutyna, Monika M., Al-Kali, Aref, Toop, Carla, Greipp, Patricia, Brown, Anna +29 more·2025·Blood Advances

Abstract

This retrospective analysis aimed to provide evidence-based risk stratification of TP53-mutated (TP53mut) myeloid neoplasms (MNs). Of 580 MNs harboring TP53mut with variant allele frequency (VAF) ≥2%, 219 (37.8%), 194 (33.4%), 92 (15.9%), and 75 (12.9%) were classified as acute myeloid leukemia (AML), myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with low blasts (MDS-LB), MDS with excess blasts (MDS-EB)-2, and -EB1 according to the revised fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, respectively. Hierarchical analysis identified the following 4 risk groups with distinct survival: (1) MDS-LB, (2) MDS-EB1/EB2/AML VAF <10%, (3) MDS-EB1/EB2 VAF ≥10%, and (4) AML VAF ≥10%. We next evaluated the impact of allelic status, VAF, and complex karyotype (CK). In our cohort, the significance of biallelic status was limited to MDS with <5% blasts and not for blasts 5% to 9%, as proposed by the International Consensus Classification (ICC), or 5% to 19%, as proposed by the fifth edition of the WHO (WHO-5). MDS-EB1 and -EB2 with VAF ≥10% had comparable survival (9.6 vs 7.2 months; P = .12), regardless of allelic status. Contrary to the ICC proposal, MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF <10% and CK had poor survival compared with those without CK, comparable to MDS-EB1/EB2 with VAF ≥10% (5.6 vs 26.2 vs 6.3 months; P = .003). Survival of TP53mut AML was poor (median 3.9 months) regardless of allelic/CK status. Thus, using ICC or WHO-5 may underestimate prognosis of MDS with blasts 5% to 19% and 5% to 9%, respectively. Collectively, the hierarchical model acknowledges poor survival of 91.9% TP53mut MDS and AML compared with 36.5% and 80.7% by WHO-5 and ICC, respectively.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/bloodadvances.2024015238

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • WHO 2022 and ICC define biallelic/multihit mTP53 MDS as discrete entities, and both systems may significantly underrecognize this entity.

    “the updated World Health Organization (WHO) 2022 criteria and the 2022 International Consensus Classification (ICC) define biallelic/multihit mTP53 MDS as discrete entities, although with heterogeneity in classification, and notably, both systems may significantly underrecognize this entity.”

    From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [12]

    The Introduction says WHO-5 and ICC recognize TP53-mutated MDS and myeloid neoplasms as distinct entities, respectively, and describes their differing criteria for biallelic or multihit MDS. The Discussion reports that WHO-5 and ICC would not classify 64% and 19%, respectively, of the study’s TP53-mutated myeloid-neoplasm cohort. Those figures concern the broader cohort, including AML, rather than showing that both systems substantially underrecognize biallelic/multihit MDS specifically. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent study identified 92% of TP53 mutant MDS/AML patients to represent a poor risk population.

    “with a recent study identifying 92% of TP53 mutant MDS/AML patients to represent a poor risk population.”
  • There is a strong interplay between VAF, allelic state, and cytogenetic complexity predicting outcomes in mTP53 MDS/AML.

    “there is a very strong interplay between VAF, allelic state, and cytogenetic complexity strongly predicting outcomes in this molecular subset”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shah, M. V., Hung, K., Baranwal, A., Kutyna, M. M., Al-Kali, A., Toop, C., Greipp, P., Brown, A., Shah, S., Khanna, S., Ladon, D., Gannamani, V., Chen, D., Begna, K., Price, Z. K., Rud, D., Litzow, M. R., Hogan, W. J., Bardy, P., Badar, T., Kumar, S., Yeung, D. T., Patnaik, M. M., Foran, J. M., He, R., Gangat, N., Scott, H. S., Arana Yi, C. Y., Alkhateeb, H., Mangaonkar, A. A., Thomas, D., Hahn, C. N., Orazi, A., Arber, D. A., Kok, C. H., Tefferi, A., & Hiwase, D.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Royal Adelaide Hospital (AU)
  • 1Division of Hematology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
  • South Australia Pathology (AU)
  • 7Department of Genetic and Molecular Pathogy, SA Pathology, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
  • Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
  • 8Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL
  • 2Department of Haematology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Central Adelaide Local Health Network, Adelaide, SA, Australia
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center (US)
  • University of Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shah, Mithun Vinod
  • Hiwase, Devendra
Venue
Blood Advances
Published
2025-07-08
Volume
9
Issue
13
Pages
3370-3380
ISSN
  • 2473-9529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-9537
OpenAlex
W4408475480
Cited by
23
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 10
FWCI
16.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Blood Advances (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Cancer Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Medical Research Future Fund
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinoids in leukemia and cellular processes
Keywords
TP53 mutation, myeloid neoplasms, risk stratification, variant allele frequency, acute myeloid leukemia, complex karyotype, International Consensus Classification, WHO classification, survival, prognostic factors, International Prognostic Scoring System
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Gene Frequency, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Prognosis, Retrospective Studies, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Risk Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review