Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 282

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Up to 8-year follow-up from RESONATE-2: first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Open access
Barr, Paul M., Owen, Carolyn, Robak, Tadeusz, Tedeschi, Alessandra, Bairey, Osnat, Burger, Jan A., Hillmen, Peter, Coutre, Steve E., Dearden, Claire, Grosicki, Sebastian, McCarthy, Helen, Li, Jian-Yong, Offner, Fritz, Moreno, Carol, Zhou, Cathy, Hsu, Emily, Szoke, Anita, Kipps, Thomas J., Ghia, Paolo·2022·Blood Advances

Abstract

We report long-term follow-up from the RESONATE-2 phase 3 study of the once-daily Bruton’s tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib, which is the only targeted therapy with significant progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) benefit in multiple randomized chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) studies. Patients (≥65 years) with previously untreated CLL, without del(17p), were randomly assigned 1:1 to once-daily ibrutinib 420 mg until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity (n = 136) or chlorambucil 0.5-0.8 mg/kg ≤12 cycles (n = 133). With up to 8 years of follow-up (range, 0.1-96.6 months; median, 82.7 months), significant PFS benefit was sustained for ibrutinib vs chlorambucil (hazard ratio [HR], 0.154; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.108-0.220). At 7 years, PFS was 59% for ibrutinib vs 9% for chlorambucil. PFS benefit was also observed for ibrutinib- vs chlorambucil-randomized patients with high-risk genomic features: del(11q) (HR, 0.033; 95% CI, 0.010-0.107) or unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain variable region (HR, 0.112; 95% CI, 0.065-0.192). OS at 7 years was 78% with ibrutinib. Prevalence of adverse events (AEs) was consistent with previous 5-year follow-up. Ibrutinib dosing was held (≥7 days) for 79 patients and reduced for 31 patients because of AEs; these AEs resolved or improved in 85% (67 of 79) and 90% (28 of 31) of patients, respectively. With up to 8 years of follow-up, 42% of patients remain on ibrutinib. Long-term RESONATE-2 data demonstrate sustained benefit with first-line ibrutinib treatment for CLL, including for patients with high-risk genomic features. These trials were registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT01722487 and #NCT01724346.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006434

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 282

Metadata

Authors
Barr, P. M., Owen, C., Robak, T., Tedeschi, A., Bairey, O., Burger, J. A., Hillmen, P., Coutre, S. E., Dearden, C., Grosicki, S., McCarthy, H., Li, J.-Y., Offner, F., Moreno, C., Zhou, C., Hsu, E., Szoke, A., Kipps, T. J., & Ghia, P.
Venue
Blood Advances
Published
2022-06-08
Volume
6
Issue
11
Pages
3440-3450
ISSN
  • 2473-9529 (ISSN-L)
  • 2473-9537
OpenAlex
W4224138250
Cited by
282
References
22
FWCI
30.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Up to 8-year follow-up from RESONATE-2: first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006434
The paper
Barr, P. M., Owen, C., Robak, T., Tedeschi, A., Bairey, O., Burger, J. A., Hillmen, P., Coutre, S. E., Dearden, C., Grosicki, S., McCarthy, H., Li, J.-Y., Offner, F., Moreno, C., Zhou, C., Hsu, E., Szoke, A., Kipps, T. J., & Ghia, P. (2022). Up to 8-year follow-up from RESONATE-2: first-line ibrutinib treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood Advances. https://doi.org/10.1182/bloodadvances.2021006434

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.