The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation
Open accessAbstract
The aim of the present study was to determine contemporary survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), and to investigate whether or not the National Institutes of Health (NIH) equation remains an accurate predictor of survival. In 576 patients with PAH referred during 1991–2007, observed survival was described using the Kaplan–Meier method. In patients with idiopathic, familial and anorexigen-associated PAH (n = 247), observed versus NIH equation predicted survival was compared. A new survival prediction equation was developed using exponential regression analysis. The observed 1-, 3- and 5-yr survival in the total cohort were 86, 69 and 61%, respectively. In patients with idiopathic, familial and anorexigen-associated PAH, the observed 1-, 3- and 5-yr survival (92, 75 and 66%, respectively) were significantly higher than the predicted survival (65, 43 and 32%, respectively). The new equation (P(t) = e-A(x,y,z)t, where P(t) is probability of survival,t the time interval in years, A(x,y,z) = e(−1.270–0.0148 x+0.0402 y–0.361 z),x the mean pulmonary artery pressure,y the mean right atrial pressure and z the cardiac index) performed well when applied to published contemporary studies of survival in PAH. Contemporary survival in the PAH cohort was better than that predicted by the NIH registry equation. The NIH equation underestimated survival in idiopathic, familial and anorexigen-associated PAH. Once prospectively validated, the new equation may be used to determine prognosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension
Galiè, N., Humbert, M., Vachiery, J.-L., Gibbs, S., Lang, I., Torbicki, A., Simonneau, G., Peacock, A., Vonk Noordegraaf, A., Beghetti, M., et al. (2016) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehv317 · Cited by 6,931
Risk stratification and medical therapy of pulmonary arterial hypertension
Galiè, N., Channick, R. N., Frantz, R. P., Grünig, E., Jing, Z. C., Moiseeva, O., Preston, I. R., Pulido, T., Safdar, Z., Tamura, Y., et al. (2019) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.01889-2018 · Cited by 819
Hoeper, M. M., Huscher, D., Ghofrani, H. A., Delcroix, M., Distler, O., Schweiger, C., Grunig, E., Staehler, G., Rosenkranz, S., Halank, M., et al. (2013) · International Journal of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.10.026 · Cited by 466
Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: The Clinical Syndrome
Lai, Y.-C., Potoka, K. C., Champion, H. C., Mora, A. L., & Gladwin, M. T. (2014) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.115.301146 · Cited by 402
Frost, A. E., Badesch, D. B., Miller, D. P., Benza, R. L., Meltzer, L. A., & McGoon, M. D. (2013) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.12-3023 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Thenappan, T., Shah, S. J., Rich, S., Tian, L., Archer, S. L., & Gomberg-Maitland, M.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2009-12-23
- Volume
- 35
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1079-1087
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2096223780
- Cited by
- 493
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00072709
- The paper
- Thenappan, T., Shah, S. J., Rich, S., Tian, L., Archer, S. L., & Gomberg-Maitland, M. (2010). Survival in pulmonary arterial hypertension: a reappraisal of the NIH risk stratification equation. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00072709
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.