The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response
Open accessAbstract
Because of the minimal demand for cooperation by the subject, the forced oscillation technique is increasingly employed in routine lung function testing. However, comprehensive and device-independent values of respiratory impedance at baseline and after bronchodilation have not been established for healthy adults. The aim of this multicentre study was to collect impedance data from 4 to 26 Hz in healthy Caucasian subjects between 18 and 80 years of age. Five different devices were employed to assess baseline values and the bronchodilator response. Altogether, 368 subjects were examined. Despite adjustment for anthropometry, the impedance spectra differed in frequency dependence between the centres, and hence could not be pooled. However, resistance at all frequencies except 20 and 25 Hz, and the low-frequency (≤14 Hz) values of reactance did not exhibit a centre dependence. The regression equations for resistance reflected a greater height dependence in males and a greater weight dependence in both males and females than those published previously. Bronchodilation resulted in a statistically significant decrease (11%) in resistance and a 95th percentile equal to a 32% decrease in resistance at low frequency. We conclude that rigorous calibration procedures should be developed to ensure data compatibility. Furthermore, new reference equations based on different setups are recommended to replace those established with a single device.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT
Martin Bland, J., & Altman, D. (1986) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(86)90837-8 · Cited by 47,965
Standardization of Spirometry, 1994 Update. American Thoracic Society.
(1995) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.152.3.7663792 · Cited by 6,594
Quanjer, P. H., Stanojevic, S., Cole, T. J., Baur, X., Hall, G. L., Culver, B. H., Enright, P. L., Hankinson, J. L., Ip, M. S. M., Zheng, J., et al. (2012) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00080312 · Cited by 5,919
Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows
Quanjer, P. H., Tammeling, G. J., Cotes, J. E., Pedersen, O. F., Peslin, R., & Yernault, J.-C. (1993) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · Cited by 5,318
(1993) · PubMed · Cited by 3,827
Oostveen, E., MacLeod, D., Lorino, H., Farré, R., Hantos, Z., Desager, K., & Marchal, F. (2003) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.03.00089403 · Cited by 1,302
Self-citationApplied Mixed Models in Medicine
Brown, H., & Presco, R. (2000) · Technometrics · doi:10.1080/00401706.2000.10485742 · Cited by 1,262
Beydon, N., Davis, S. D., Lombardi, E., Allen, J. L., Arets, H. G. M., Aurora, P., Bisgaard, H., Davis, G. M., Ducharme, F. M., Eigen, H., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200605-642st · Cited by 1,250
Self-citationEffects of Obesity on Respiratory Resistance
Zerah, F., Harf, A., Perlemuter, L., Lorino, H., Lorino, A.-M., & Atlan, G. (1993) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.103.5.1470 · Cited by 450
(1975) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-83-5-751_3 · Cited by 241
Cited by
Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry
King, G. G., Bates, J., Berger, K. I., Calverley, P., de Melo, P. L., Dellacà, R. L., Farré, R., Hall, G. L., Ioan, I., Irvin, C. G., et al. (2020) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/13993003.00753-2019 · Cited by 756
Self-citationClinical significance and applications of oscillometry
Kaminsky, D. A., Simpson, S. J., Berger, K. I., Calverley, P., de Melo, P. L., Dandurand, R., Dellacà, R. L., Farah, C. S., Farré, R., Hall, G. L., et al. (2022) · European Respiratory Review · doi:10.1183/16000617.0208-2021 · Cited by 257
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Oostveen, E., Boda, K., van der Grinten, C. P. M., James, A. L., Young, S., Nieland, H., & Hantos, Z.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2013-04-18
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1513-1523
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2080475703
- Cited by
- 262
- References
- 18
- FWCI
- 6.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00126212
- The paper
- Oostveen, E., Boda, K., van der Grinten, C. P. M., James, A. L., Young, S., Nieland, H., & Hantos, Z. (2013). Respiratory impedance in healthy subjects: baseline values and bronchodilator response. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00126212
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
