Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 756

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 64 of the 64 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry

Open access
King, Gregory G., Bates, Jason, Berger, Kenneth I., Calverley, Peter, de Melo, Pedro L., Dellacà, Raffaele L., Farré, Ramon, Hall, Graham L., Ioan, Iulia, Irvin, Charles G., Kaczka, David W., Kaminsky, David A., Kurosawa, Hajime, Lombardi, Enrico, Maksym, Geoffrey N., Marchal, François, Oppenheimer, Beno W., Simpson, Shannon J., Thamrin, Cindy, van den Berge, Maarten, Oostveen, Ellie·2020·European Respiratory Journal
DOI 10.1183/13993003.00753-2019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Oscillometry (also known as the forced oscillation technique) measures the mechanical properties of the respiratory system (upper and intrathoracic airways, lung tissue and chest wall) during quiet tidal breathing, by the application of an oscillating pressure signal (input or forcing signal), most commonly at the mouth. With increased clinical and research use, it is critical that all technical details of the hardware design, signal processing and analyses, and testing protocols are transparent and clearly reported to allow standardisation, comparison and replication of clinical and research studies. Because of this need, an update of the 2003 European Respiratory Society (ERS) technical standards document was produced by an ERS task force of experts who are active in clinical oscillometry research. The aim of the task force was to provide technical recommendations regarding oscillometry measurement including hardware, software, testing protocols and quality control. The main changes in this update, compared with the 2003 ERS task force document are 1) new quality control procedures which reflect use of “within-breath” analysis, and methods of handling artefacts; 2) recommendation to disclose signal processing, quality control, artefact handling and breathing protocols (e.g.number and duration of acquisitions) in reports and publications to allow comparability and replication between devices and laboratories; 3) a summary review of new data to support threshold values for bronchodilator and bronchial challenge tests; and 4) updated list of predicted impedance values in adults and children.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.00753-2019

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 64 references

Cited by

See all 756

Metadata

Authors
King, G. G., Bates, J., Berger, K. I., Calverley, P., de Melo, P. L., Dellacà, R. L., Farré, R., Hall, G. L., Ioan, I., Irvin, C. G., Kaczka, D. W., Kaminsky, D. A., Kurosawa, H., Lombardi, E., Maksym, G. N., Marchal, F., Oppenheimer, B. W., Simpson, S. J., Thamrin, C., van den Berge, M., & Oostveen, E.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Publisher
European Respiratory Society (ERS)
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
1900753
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
DOI
10.1183/13993003.00753-2019
OpenAlex
W2990410265
Cited by
756
References
64
FWCI
34.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.00753-2019
The paper
King, G. G., Bates, J., Berger, K. I., Calverley, P., de Melo, P. L., Dellacà, R. L., Farré, R., Hall, G. L., Ioan, I., Irvin, C. G., Kaczka, D. W., Kaminsky, D. A., Kurosawa, H., Lombardi, E., Maksym, G. N., Marchal, F., Oppenheimer, B. W., Simpson, S. J., Thamrin, C., . . . Oostveen, E. (2020). Technical standards for respiratory oscillometry. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00753-2019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.