Cited by 25Respiratory and Cough-Related ResearchHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityClinical practice guidelines implementation

The online Cough Clinic: developing guideline-based diagnosis and advice

Open access
Dettmar, P. W., Strugala, V., Fathi, H., Dettmar, H. J., Wright, C., Morice, A. H.·2009·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The aim of the present study was make chronic cough guidelines more practical and user friendly by developing an internet-based interactive diagnostic questionnaire for chronic cough. A prospective cohort study of chronic cough sufferers was conducted in the UK, following European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic cough. Depending on the response to 16 specific questions, the medical condition responsible for the patient's chronic cough was ascertained according to a predetermined diagnostic algorithm designed to differentiate the three common causes of chronic cough. Appropriate advice and treatment recommendations were then provided. 8,546 adults with chronic cough completed the Cough Clinic diagnostic questionnaire. 46.1% were suggested to have reflux, 38.7% asthma and 15.2% rhinitis. Participants found the website easy to use (94%), the advice helpful (73%) and that it helped them to communicate with their general practitioner better (60%), and 62% reported taking the recommended treatment. The Cough Clinic, an internet-based diagnostic site for chronic cough, had a large uptake by chronic cough sufferers in the UK. Almost half were diagnosed as having reflux as the probable cause of their chronic cough. Internet diagnosis by expert algorithm provides a novel mechanism for patients to access guideline-recommended therapies and enhances dialogue between patients and physicians.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00126908

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [17]17. Hoffstein V. Persistent cough in nonsmoker. Can Respir J 1994; 1: 40-47. Asthma 38.7% Rhinitis 15.2% Reflux 46.1% 18

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dettmar, P. W., Strugala, V., Fathi, H., Dettmar, H. J., Wright, C., & Morice, A. H.
Affiliations
  • Technostics (United Kingdom) (GB)
  • Castle Hill Hospital (GB)
  • University of Hull (GB)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2009-03-26
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
819-824
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2114052152
Cited by
25
References
34
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3
FWCI
2.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Repository@Hull (Worktribe) (University of Hull) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Keywords
chronic cough, online diagnosis, reflux, asthma, rhinitis, diagnostic algorithm, patient-provider communication
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Algorithms, Chronic Disease, Cough, Female, Follow-Up Studies, United Kingdom, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, User-Computer Interface, Reproducibility of Results, Program Evaluation, Patient Satisfaction, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Evidence-Based Medicine, Internet, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review