Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 497

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Eosinophilic inflammation in COPD: prevalence and clinical characteristics

Open access
Singh, Dave, Kolsum, Umme, Brightling, Chris E., Locantore, Nicholas, Agusti, Alvar, Tal-Singer, Ruth·2014·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

is a heterogeneous condition, with patients displaying varying clinical and pathophysiological features.The identification of COPD phenotypes with distinct characteristics may allow targeted treatment strategies directed towards specific biological pathways.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00162414

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 497

Metadata

Authors
Singh, D., Kolsum, U., Brightling, C. E., Locantore, N., Agusti, A., & Tal-Singer, R.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2014-10-16
Volume
44
Issue
6
Pages
1697-1700
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2113430717
Cited by
497
References
0
FWCI
19.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eosinophilic inflammation in COPD: prevalence and clinical characteristics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00162414
The paper
Singh, D., Kolsum, U., Brightling, C. E., Locantore, N., Agusti, A., & Tal-Singer, R. (2014). Eosinophilic inflammation in COPD: prevalence and clinical characteristics. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00162414

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.