Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 528

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a consensus statement on diagnostic and treatment approaches in children

Open access
Barbato, A., Frischer, T., Kuehni, C. E., Snijders, D., Azevedo, I., Baktai, G., Bartoloni, L., Eber, E., Escribano, A., Haarman, E., Hesselmar, B., Hogg, C., Jorissen, M., Lucas, J., Nielsen, K. G., O'Callaghan, C., Omran, H., Pohunek, P., Strippoli, M-P. F., Bush, A.·2009·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Primary ciliary dyskinesia (PCD) is associated with abnormal ciliary structure and function, which results in retention of mucus and bacteria in the respiratory tract, leading to chronic oto-sino-pulmonary disease,situs abnormalities and abnormal sperm motility. The diagnosis of PCD requires the presence of the characteristic clinical phenotype and either specific ultrastructural ciliary defects identified by transmission electron microscopy or evidence of abnormal ciliary function. Although the management of children affected with PCD remains uncertain and evidence is limited, it remains important to follow-up these patients with an adequate and shared care system in order to prevent future lung damage. This European Respiratory Society consensus statement on the management of children with PCD formulates recommendations regarding diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in order to permit a more accurate approach in these patients. Large well-designed randomised controlled trials, with clear description of patients, are required in order to improve these recommendations on diagnostic and treatment approaches in this disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.00176608

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 528

Metadata

Authors
Barbato, A., Frischer, T., Kuehni, C. E., Snijders, D., Azevedo, I., Baktai, G., Bartoloni, L., Eber, E., Escribano, A., Haarman, E., Hesselmar, B., Hogg, C., Jorissen, M., Lucas, J., Nielsen, K. G., O'Callaghan, C., Omran, H., Pohunek, P., Strippoli, M.-P. F., & Bush, A.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2009-11-30
Volume
34
Issue
6
Pages
1264-1276
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2104946337
Cited by
528
References
2
FWCI
21.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a consensus statement on diagnostic and treatment approaches in children. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.00176608
The paper
Barbato, A., Frischer, T., Kuehni, C. E., Snijders, D., Azevedo, I., Baktai, G., Bartoloni, L., Eber, E., Escribano, A., Haarman, E., Hesselmar, B., Hogg, C., Jorissen, M., Lucas, J., Nielsen, K. G., O'Callaghan, C., Omran, H., Pohunek, P., Strippoli, M.-P. F., & Bush, A. (2009). Primary ciliary dyskinesia: a consensus statement on diagnostic and treatment approaches in children. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.00176608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.