Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 698

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 107 of the 107 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia

Open access
Lucas, Jane S., Barbato, Angelo, Collins, Samuel A., Goutaki, Myrofora, Behan, Laura, Caudri, Daan, Dell, Sharon, Eber, Ernst, Escudier, Estelle, Hirst, Robert A., Hogg, Claire, Jorissen, Mark, Latzin, Philipp, Legendre, Marie, Leigh, Margaret W., Midulla, Fabio, Nielsen, Kim G., Omran, Heymut, Papon, Jean-Francois, Pohunek, Petr, Redfern, Beatrice, Rigau, David, Rindlisbacher, Bernhard, Santamaria, Francesca, Shoemark, Amelia, Snijders, Deborah, Tonia, Thomy, Titieni, Andrea, Walker, Woolf T., Werner, Claudius, Bush, Andrew, Kuehni, Claudia E.·2017·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia is often confirmed with standard, albeit complex and expensive, tests. In many cases, however, the diagnosis remains difficult despite the array of sophisticated diagnostic tests. There is no “gold standard” reference test. Hence, a Task Force supported by the European Respiratory Society has developed this guideline to provide evidence-based recommendations on diagnostic testing, especially in light of new developments in such tests, and the need for robust diagnoses of patients who might enter randomised controlled trials of treatments. The guideline is based on pre-defined questions relevant for clinical care, a systematic review of the literature, and assessment of the evidence using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach. It focuses on clinical presentation, nasal nitric oxide, analysis of ciliary beat frequency and pattern by high-speed video-microscopy analysis, transmission electron microscopy, genotyping and immunofluorescence. It then used a modified Delphi survey to develop an algorithm for the use of diagnostic tests to definitively confirm and exclude the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia; and to provide advice when the diagnosis was not conclusive. Finally, this guideline proposes a set of quality criteria for future research on the validity of diagnostic methods for primary ciliary dyskinesia.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.01090-2016

Cites

107 of 107 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 107 references

Cited by

See all 698

Metadata

Authors
Lucas, J. S., Barbato, A., Collins, S. A., Goutaki, M., Behan, L., Caudri, D., Dell, S., Eber, E., Escudier, E., Hirst, R. A., Hogg, C., Jorissen, M., Latzin, P., Legendre, M., Leigh, M. W., Midulla, F., Nielsen, K. G., Omran, H., Papon, J.-F., Pohunek, P., Redfern, B., Rigau, D., Rindlisbacher, B., Santamaria, F., Shoemark, A., Snijders, D., Tonia, T., Titieni, A., Walker, W. T., Werner, C., Bush, A., & Kuehni, C. E.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2016-11-11
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
1601090
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2554519038
Cited by
698
References
107
FWCI
49.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.01090-2016
The paper
Lucas, J. S., Barbato, A., Collins, S. A., Goutaki, M., Behan, L., Caudri, D., Dell, S., Eber, E., Escudier, E., Hirst, R. A., Hogg, C., Jorissen, M., Latzin, P., Legendre, M., Leigh, M. W., Midulla, F., Nielsen, K. G., Omran, H., Papon, J.-F., . . . Kuehni, C. E. (2017). European Respiratory Society guidelines for the diagnosis of primary ciliary dyskinesia. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01090-2016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.