Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 736

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improved health outcomes in patients with COPD during 1 yr's treatment with tiotropium

Open access
Vincken, W., van Noord, J.A., Greefhorst, A.P.M., Bantje, Th.A., Kesten, S., Korducki, L., Cornelissen, P.J.G.·2002·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Tiotropium, a novel once-daily inhaled anticholinergic, has been shown to improve lung function over a 24-h period. In order to extend these findings, health-outcomes were evaluated over 1 yr in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Spirometric results, peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR), salbutamol use and effects on dyspnoea, health-related quality of life and COPD exacerbations were assessed in two identical 1-yr randomized double-blind double-dummy studies of tiotropium 18µg once daily (n=356) compared with ipratropium 40µg q.i.d.(n=179). Screening forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV 1) were 1.25±0.43 L (41.9±12.7% of the predicted value) (tiotropium) and 1.18±0.37 L (39.4±10.7% pred) (ipratropium). Trough FEV 1 at 1 yr improved by 0.12±0.01 L with tiotropium and declined by 0.03±0.02 L with ipratropium (p<0.001). Significant improvement in PEFR, salbutamol use, Transition Dyspnea Index focal score, and the St George's Respiratory Questionnaire total and impact scores were seen with tiotropium (p<0.01). Tiotropium reduced the number of exacerbations (by 24%, p<0.01), and increased time to first exacerbation (p<0.01) and time to first hospitalization for a COPD exacerbation (p<0.05) compared with ipratropium. Apart from an increased incidence of dry mouth in the tiotropium group, adverse events were similar between treatments. Tiotropium was effective in improving dyspnoea, exacerbations, health-related quality of life and lung function in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and exceeds the benefits seen with ipratropium. The data support the use of tiotropium once-daily as first-line maintenance treatment in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.02.00238702

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 736

Metadata

Authors
Vincken, W., van Noord, J. A., Greefhorst, A. P. M., Bantje, T. A., Kesten, S., Korducki, L., & Cornelissen, P. J. G.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2002-02
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
209-216
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2107045802
Cited by
736
References
4
FWCI
60.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improved health outcomes in patients with COPD during 1 yr's treatment with tiotropium. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.02.00238702
The paper
Vincken, W., van Noord, J. A., Greefhorst, A. P. M., Bantje, T. A., Kesten, S., Korducki, L., & Cornelissen, P. J. G. (2002). Improved health outcomes in patients with COPD during 1 yr's treatment with tiotropium. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.02.00238702

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.