The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Systematic assessment of difficult-to-treat asthma
Open accessAbstract
Five per cent of asthmatics remain symptomatic despite high-dose treatment. The aim of the study was to investigate how often such difficult-to-treat asthma is due to intractable asthma, misdiagnosis, non-adherence with therapy, or psychiatric problems. Difficult asthma was defined as persistence of symptoms despite treatment at step 4 of British guidelines or requirement for long-term oral glucocorticoids (step 5). One-hundred patients with a respiratory physician diagnosis of asthma were investigated in a single tertiary respiratory unit in an open and descriptive study. Twelve of the patients studied did not have asthma and a further seven had additional diagnoses. Of the remainder, 55 had an asthma diagnosis confirmed by demonstration of reversible airflow narrowing or peak flow variability, whilst 20 did not. Noncompliance with prednisolone therapy was more frequent in the 55 with confirmed asthma (nine of 18 prescribed oral prednisolone at a dose of ≥15 mg·day−1) and was not detected in the “unconfirmed asthma” group. There were no other significant differences between these groups. A major psychiatric component was detected in 10 patients. Systematic evaluation of difficult asthma is useful as it can identify alternative or additional diagnoses, psychiatric illness or nonconcordance with therapy in a substantial proportion of cases (32% in the present series).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jones, P. W., Quirk, F. H., Baveystock, C. M., & Littlejohns, P. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321 · Cited by 3,035
MILES, J. E., GARDEN, G. M. E., TUNNICLIFFE, W. S., CAYTON, R. M., & AYRES, J. G. (1997) · Clinical <html_ent glyph="@amp;" ascii="&"/> Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1997.tb01152.x · Cited by 68
Cited by
International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma
Chung, K. F., Wenzel, S. E., Brozek, J. L., Bush, A., Castro, M., Sterk, P. J., Adcock, I. M., Bateman, E. D., Bel, E. H., Bleecker, E. R., et al. (2014) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.00202013 · Cited by 3,926
Self-citationRisk factors of frequent exacerbations in difficult-to-treat asthma
ten Brinke, A., Sterk, P. J., Masclee, A. A. M., Spinhoven, P., Schmidt, J. T., Zwinderman, A. H., Rabe, K. F., & Bel, E. H. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00037905 · Cited by 490
Update on glucocorticoid action and resistance
Ito, K., Chung, K. F., & Adcock, I. M. (2006) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2006.01.032 · Cited by 397
Self-citationA role for eosinophils in airway remodelling in asthma
Kay, A. B., Phipps, S., & Robinson, D. S. (2004) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2004.07.006 · Cited by 320
Self-citationUncontrolled asthma: A review of the prevalence, disease burden and options for treatment
Peters, S. P., Ferguson, G., Deniz, Y., & Reisner, C. (2006) · Respiratory Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.rmed.2006.03.031 · Cited by 320
Metadata
- Authors
- Robinson, D. S., Campbell, D. A., Durham, S. R., Pfeffer, J., Barnes, P. J., & Chung, K. F.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 478-483
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2157369643
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.70
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Systematic assessment of difficult-to-treat asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.03.00017003
- The paper
- Robinson, D. S., Campbell, D. A., Durham, S. R., Pfeffer, J., Barnes, P. J., & Chung, K. F. (2003). Systematic assessment of difficult-to-treat asthma. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.03.00017003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.