Cited by 76Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSleep and related disorders

Laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty for snoring: does it meet the expectations?

Open access
Larrosa, F., Hernandez, L., Morello, A., Ballester, E., Quinto, L., Montserrat, J.M.·2004·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The high prevalence of habitual snoring (35% of the general population) and the increasing demand for an effective treatment have led, in the last decade, to the generalisation of laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty (LAUP). However, acceptable studies on its effectiveness are lacking. The present randomised, placebo-controlled study included 25 nonapnoeic and mild obstructive sleep apnoea snorers to evaluate LAUP effectiveness for snoring. Group I received a one-stage LAUP treatment and group II a placebo (simulated snore surgery followed by an oral placebo). Before each treatment and 3 months after, the variables and procedures assessed were: body weight; sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale); quality of life (SF‐36); subjective snoring intensity (0–10 analogue scale); objective snoring intensity (average decibel intensity); snoring index (number of snores per hour); and apnoea/hypopnea index. No differences were observed in body weight, sleepiness, quality of life, subjective and objective intensity, and frequency of snoring, and apnoea/hypopnea index between the groups before and 3 months after treatment. In conclusion, this study provides evidence of the lack of effectiveness of one-stage laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty for snoring in nonapnoeic and mild obstructive sleep apnoea patients, with the result that it does not meet the expectations generated by the procedure.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.04.00082903

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Larrosa et al. failed to find a difference between LAUP and a Sham surgery in sleepiness, quality of life or respiratory disturbances.

    “Larrosa et al. 214 failed to find a difference between LAUP and a Sham surgery in sleepiness, quality of life or respiratory disturbances.”

    From Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea (2011) · cites this paper as [214]

  • Two randomised controlled trials are available.

    “Two randomised controlled trials are available 213, 214.”

    From Non-CPAP therapies in obstructive sleep apnoea (2011) · cites this paper as [214]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [7]7. Katsantonis GP, Maas CS, Walsh JK. The predictive efficacy of the Mu ´ller manoeuvre in uvulopalatopharyngo- plasty. Laryngoscope 1989; 99: 677-680.
  2. [8]8. Haponik EF, Smith PL, Bohlman ME, Allen RP, Goldman SM, Blecker ER. Computerised tomography in obstructive sleep apnea. Am Rev Respir Dis 1983; 127: 221-226.
  3. [13]13. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short form health survey (SF-36). Med Care 1992; 30: 473-483.
  4. [14]14. Hoffstein V. Snoring. Chest 1996; 109: 201-222.
  5. [18]18. Del Can ˜izo A. Treatment of chronic snoring with CO2 laser (LAUP). Acta Otorrinolaring Esp 1997; 48: 121-125.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Larrosa, F., Hernandez, L., Morello, A., Ballester, E., Quinto, L., & Montserrat, J. M.
Affiliations
Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2004-07
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
66-70
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2125884856
Cited by
76
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
Keywords
laser-assisted uvulopalatoplasty, snoring, obstructive sleep apnea, snoring surgery, treatment effectiveness, apnea-hypopnea index, sleepiness, quality of life, snoring intensity
MeSH terms
Adult, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Palate, Soft, Probability, Severity of Illness Index, Snoring, Uvula, Treatment Outcome, Polysomnography, Risk Assessment, Statistics, Nonparametric, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Laser Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review