Flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation: key concepts in modern respiratory physiology
Open accessAbstract
Fashions in ideas, like clothes, come and go. From approximately 1950–1980, physiological research was seen as the key discipline in understanding lung disease and was at the cutting edge of pulmonary science. Subsequently, its importance has been down played amid a widely accepted but unfounded assumption that we now have a perfect working understanding of the physiological behaviour of the respiratory system in health and disease. Although it seems improbable that completely new disciplines within respiratory physiology will emerge with fundamentally different ways of describing the mechanical or gas exchanging function of the lung, advances in computing and new observations in disease have highlighted previously unsuspected physiological abnormalities that have changed the way we view lung disease and the interface between disordered lung mechanics, symptomatology and disability. This is especially true for the two related physiological concepts of expiratory flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation, which are now being taken from the physiological laboratory to the bedside with dramatic effect. Each arises from well-established theoretical and practical observations first made 40 yrs ago and now adapted to a range of settings, particularly in the field of obstructive lung disease. This review focuses on how these conditions are defined and assessed and what evidence there is that they might be important in lung disease.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, the level of dynamic hyperinflation is poorly related to FEV1.
“In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, the level of dynamic hyperinflation is poorly related to FEV1.49”
From Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (2014) · cites this paper as [49]
Cites
O'DONNELL, D. E., LAM, M., & WEBB, K. A. (1998) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.158.5.9804004 · Cited by 532 · cited 1× · see citing works
“This was noted to be a common finding in patients with COPD during exercise [73, 74] and one that related to the intensity of their breathlessness during exercise [ 75 ].”
BackgroundBelman, M. J., Botnick, W. C., & Shin, J. W. (1996) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.153.3.8630581 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
O'Donnell, D. E., Voduc, N., Fitzpatrick, M., & Webb, K. A. (2004) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.04.00072703 · Cited by 365 · see citing works
Diaz, O., Villafranca, C., Ghezzo, H., Borzone, G., Leiva, A., Milic-Emil, J., & Lisboa, C. (2000) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1034/j.1399-3003.2000.16b14.x · Cited by 300 · see citing works
Regional chest wall volumes during exercise in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Aliverti, A. (2004) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.2003.011494 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Respiratory mechanics during exercise in endurance‐trained men and women
Guenette, J. A., Witt, J. D., McKenzie, D. C., Road, J. D., & Sheel, A. W. (2007) · The Journal of Physiology · doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2006.126466 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Pathogenesis of hyperinflation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Saey, Gagnon, P., Guenette, J., Langer, D., Laviolette, L., Mainguy, V., Maltais, F., & Ribeiro, F. (2014) · International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease · doi:10.2147/copd.s38934 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
“In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, the level of dynamic hyperinflation is poorly related to FEV 1 .(49) However, when comparing two patients with similar FEV 1 , the”
- Authors
- Calverley, P. M. A., & Koulouris, N. G.
- Affiliations
- Aintree University Hospital (GB)
- National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2005-01
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 186-199
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2167652046
- Cited by
- 258
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 13.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
- Keywords
- expiratory flow limitation, dynamic hyperinflation, respiratory mechanics, obstructive lung disease, lung disease assessment, pulmonary function tests, gas exchange
- MeSH terms
- Airway Resistance, Asthma, Female, Functional Residual Capacity, Humans, Inspiratory Capacity, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Prognosis, Respiratory Physiological Phenomena, Sensitivity and Specificity, Respiratory Mechanics, Risk Assessment, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review