Cited by 258Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseasesRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

Flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation: key concepts in modern respiratory physiology

Open access
Calverley, P. M. A., Koulouris, N. G.·2005·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Fashions in ideas, like clothes, come and go. From approximately 1950–1980, physiological research was seen as the key discipline in understanding lung disease and was at the cutting edge of pulmonary science. Subsequently, its importance has been down played amid a widely accepted but unfounded assumption that we now have a perfect working understanding of the physiological behaviour of the respiratory system in health and disease. Although it seems improbable that completely new disciplines within respiratory physiology will emerge with fundamentally different ways of describing the mechanical or gas exchanging function of the lung, advances in computing and new observations in disease have highlighted previously unsuspected physiological abnormalities that have changed the way we view lung disease and the interface between disordered lung mechanics, symptomatology and disability. This is especially true for the two related physiological concepts of expiratory flow limitation and dynamic hyperinflation, which are now being taken from the physiological laboratory to the bedside with dramatic effect. Each arises from well-established theoretical and practical observations first made 40 yrs ago and now adapted to a range of settings, particularly in the field of obstructive lung disease. This review focuses on how these conditions are defined and assessed and what evidence there is that they might be important in lung disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.04.00113204

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, the level of dynamic hyperinflation is poorly related to FEV1.

    “In patients with moderate-to-severe COPD, the level of dynamic hyperinflation is poorly related to FEV1.49”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Calverley, P. M. A., & Koulouris, N. G.
Affiliations
  • Aintree University Hospital (GB)
  • National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (GR)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2005-01
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
186-199
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2167652046
Cited by
258
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 17 · 2012: 19
FWCI
13.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
expiratory flow limitation, dynamic hyperinflation, respiratory mechanics, obstructive lung disease, lung disease assessment, pulmonary function tests, gas exchange
MeSH terms
Airway Resistance, Asthma, Female, Functional Residual Capacity, Humans, Inspiratory Capacity, Lung Volume Measurements, Male, Maximal Expiratory Flow Rate, Positive-Pressure Respiration, Prognosis, Respiratory Physiological Phenomena, Sensitivity and Specificity, Respiratory Mechanics, Risk Assessment, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review