The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Corticosteroid treatment in sarcoidosis
Open accessAbstract
At present there is no curative treatment for sarcoidosis. Immunosuppressive and/or immunomodulatory drugs can, however, be used for controlling the disease. Corticosteroids remain the mainstay of therapy. They function by suppressing the pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that are involved in cell-mediated immune responses and granuloma formation. Only in a select group of patients is it justifiable to use these drugs, after careful evaluation of the pros and cons. Importantly, disease severity,e.g.threatened organ functions, and not disease activity itself should be the deciding factor in this process. In the case of parenchymal involvement, there is substantial evidence that corticosteroids can improve respiratory symptoms and chest radiography and lung function parameters over 6–24 months. Other generally acknowledged (empirical) criteria for systemic treatment include neurological, cardiac and sight-threatening ocular involvement and hypercalcaemia. Remarkably, despite >50 yrs of use, there is no proof of long-term (survival) benefit from corticosteroid treatment. In addition, there are still no data regarding the optimal dose and duration of corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive therapy. One of the weightiest questions remaining is whether or not these drugs can prevent scarring in patients with a fibrogenic phenotype. As new agents, including infliximab and thalidomide, enter the stage and new diagnostic tools are now available, there is clearly a momentum to design multicentric randomised controlled trials with long enough follow-up (>5 yrs) to answer this pivotal question.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Roberts, W. C., McAllister, H. A., & Ferrans, V. J. (1977) · The American Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1016/0002-9343(77)90121-8 · Cited by 789
Cited by
Birnie, D. H., Nery, P. B., Ha, A. C., & Beanlands, R. S. B. (2016) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.03.605 · Cited by 569
Kim, J. S., Judson, M. A., Donnino, R., Gold, M., Cooper, L. T., Prystowsky, E. N., & Prystowsky, S. (2009) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/j.ahj.2008.09.009 · Cited by 328
Metadata
- Authors
- Grutters, J. C., & van den Bosch, J. M. M.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 2006-08-31
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 627-636
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2019142028
- Cited by
- 200
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Corticosteroid treatment in sarcoidosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.06.00105805
- The paper
- Grutters, J. C., & van den Bosch, J. M. M. (2006). Corticosteroid treatment in sarcoidosis. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.06.00105805
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.