The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid turnover
Open accessAbstract
The pleural space contains a tiny amount (approximately 0.3 mL.kg-1) of hypooncotic fluid (approximately 1 g.dL-1 protein). Pleural fluid turnover is estimated to be approximately 0.15 mL.kg-1.h-1. Pleural fluid is produced at parietal pleural level, mainly in the less dependent regions of the cavity. Reabsorption is accomplished by parietal pleural lymphatics in the most dependent part of the cavity, on the diaphragmatic surface and in the mediastinal regions. The flow rate in pleural lymphatics can increase in response to an increase in pleural fluid filtration, acting as a negative feedback mechanism to control pleural liquid volume. Such control is very efficient, as a 10 fold increase in filtration rate would only result in a 15% increase in pleural liquid volume. When filtration exceeds maximum pleural lymphatic flow, pleural effusion occurs: as an estimate, in man, maximum pleural lymph flow could attain 30 mL.h-1, equivalent to approximately 700 mL.day-1 (approximately 40% of overall lymph flow). Under physiological conditions, the lung interstitium and the pleural space behave as functionally independent compartments, due to the low water and solute permeability of the visceral pleura. Pleural fluid circulates in the pleural cavity and intrapleural fluid dynamics may be represented by a porous flow model. Lubrication between lung and chest wall is assured by oligolamellar surfactant molecules stratified on mesothelial cells of the opposing pleurae. These molecules carry a charge of similar sign and, therefore, repulse each other, assuring a graphite-like lubrication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Donaldson, K., Murphy, F. A., Duffin, R., & Poland, C. A. (2010) · Particle and Fibre Toxicology · doi:10.1186/1743-8977-7-5 · Cited by 916
Nagai, H., Okazaki, Y., Chew, S. H., Misawa, N., Yamashita, Y., Akatsuka, S., Ishihara, T., Yamashita, K., Yoshikawa, Y., Yasui, H., et al. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1110013108 · Cited by 535
Dengue Virus NS1 Disrupts the Endothelial Glycocalyx, Leading to Hyperpermeability
Puerta-Guardo, H., Glasner, D. R., & Harris, E. (2016) · PLOS Pathogens · doi:10.1371/journal.ppat.1005738 · Cited by 384
Randomised trial of intrapleural urokinase in the treatment of childhood empyema
Thomson, A. H. (2002) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.57.4.343 · Cited by 305
Reactive Oxygen Species a Double-Edged Sword for Mesothelioma
Benedetti, S., Nuvoli, B., Catalani, S., & Galati, R. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.4253 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Miserocchi, G.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 1997-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 219-225
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2108457871
- Cited by
- 315
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid turnover. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.97.10010219
- The paper
- Miserocchi, G. (1997). Physiology and pathophysiology of pleural fluid turnover. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.97.10010219
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.