The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in COPD patients with postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency
Open accessAbstract
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have been intubated and mechanically ventilated may prove difficult to wean. Noninvasive ventilation may be used in an attempt to avoid new endotracheal intubation. The efficacy of administration of noninvasive pressure support ventilation was evaluated in 30 COPD patients with postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency, compared with 30 historically matched control patients who were treated conventionally. Patients were included in the study if, within 72 h postextubation, they presented with respiratory distress, defined as the combination of a respiratory frequency >25 breaths x min(-1), an increase in the arterial carbon dioxide tension (Pa,CO2) of at least 20% compared with the value measured after extubation, and a pH <7.35. Noninvasive pressure support ventilation was effective in correcting gas exchange abnormalities. The use of noninvasive ventilation significantly reduced the need for endotracheal intubation: 20 of the 30 patients (67%) in the control group required endotracheal intubation, compared with only six of the 30 patients (20%) in the noninvasive-ventilation group (p<0.001). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the two groups, but the mean duration of ventilatory assistance for the treatment of the postextubation distress, and the length of intensive care unit stay related to this event, were both significantly shortened by noninvasive ventilation (p<0.01). In conclusion, noninvasive ventilation may be used in the management of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Vestbo, J., Hurd, S. S., Agustí, A. G., Jones, P. W., Vogelmeier, C., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Martinez, F. J., Nishimura, M., et al. (2013) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.201204-0596pp · Cited by 15,983
Rabe, K. F., Hurd, S., Anzueto, A., Barnes, P. J., Buist, S. A., Calverley, P., Fukuchi, Y., Jenkins, C., Rodriguez-Roisin, R., van Weel, C., et al. (2007) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200703-456so · Cited by 4,925
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation for Respiratory Failure after Extubation
Esteban, A., Frutos-Vivar, F., Ferguson, N. D., Arabi, Y., Apezteguía, C., González, M., Epstein, S. K., Hill, N. S., Nava, S., Soares, M.-A., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032736 · Cited by 894
Time of non-invasive ventilation
Nava, S., Navalesi, P., & Conti, G. (2006) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-005-0050-0 · Cited by 144
Metadata
- Authors
- Hilbert, G., Gruson, D., Portel, L., Gbikpi-Benissan, G., & Cardinaud, J.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1349-1353
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W2106592687
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in COPD patients with postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.98.11061349
- The paper
- Hilbert, G., Gruson, D., Portel, L., Gbikpi-Benissan, G., & Cardinaud, J. (1998). Noninvasive pressure support ventilation in COPD patients with postextubation hypercapnic respiratory insufficiency. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.98.11061349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.