Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 273

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A randomized trial of nocturnal oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients

Open access
Chaouat, A, Weitzenblum, E, Kessler, R, Charpentier, C, Enrhart, M, Schott, R, Levi-Valensi, P, Zielinski, J, Delaunois, L, Cornudella, R, Moutinho dos Santos, J·1999·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

The beneficial effects of nocturnal oxygen therapy (NOT) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with mild-to-moderate daytime hypoxaemia (arterial oxygen tension (Pa,O2) in the range 7.4-9.2 kPa (56-69 mmHg)) and exhibiting sleep-related oxygen desaturation remains controversial. The effectiveness of NOT in that category of COPD patients was studied. The end points included pulmonary haemodynamic effects after 2 yrs of follow-up, survival and requirement for long-term oxygen therapy (LTOT). Seventy-six patients could be randomized, 41 were allocated to NOT and 35 to no NOT (control). The goal of NOT was to achieve an arterial oxygen saturation of >90% throughout the night. All these patients underwent polysomnography to exclude an associated obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome. The two groups exhibited an identical meansD daytime Pa,O2 of 8.4+/-0.4 kPa (63+/-3 mmHg) at baseline. Twenty-two patients (12 in the NOT group and 10 in the control group, p=0.98) required LTOT during the whole follow-up (35+/-14 months). Sixteen patients died, nine in the NOT group and seven in the control group (p=0.84). Forty-six patients were able to undergo pulmonary haemodynamic re-evaluation after 2 yrs, 24 in the NOT and 22 in the control group. In the control group, mean resting pulmonary artery pressure increased from 19.8+/-5.6 to 20.5+6.5 mmHg, which was not different from the change in mean pulmonary artery pressure in the NOT group, from 18.3+/-4.7 to 19.5+/-5.3 mmHg (p= 0.79). Nocturnal oxygen therapy did not modify the evolution of pulmonary haemodynamics and did not allow delay in the prescription of long-term oxygen therapy. No effect of NOT on survival was observed, but the small number of deaths precluded any firm conclusion. These results suggest that the prescription of nocturnal oxygen therapy in isolation is probably not justified in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/09031936.99.14510029

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 273

Metadata

Authors
Chaouat, A., Weitzenblum, E., Kessler, R., Charpentier, C., Enrhart, M., Schott, R., Levi-Valensi, P., Zielinski, J., Delaunois, L., Cornudella, R., & Moutinho dos Santos, J.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
1999-11-01
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
1002-1008
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2138208423
Cited by
273
References
0
FWCI
7.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A randomized trial of nocturnal oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09031936.99.14510029
The paper
Chaouat, A., Weitzenblum, E., Kessler, R., Charpentier, C., Enrhart, M., Schott, R., Levi-Valensi, P., Zielinski, J., Delaunois, L., Cornudella, R., & Moutinho dos Santos, J. (1999). A randomized trial of nocturnal oxygen therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease patients. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09031936.99.14510029

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.