The DOI matches its Crossref record; 128 of the 128 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults
Open accessAbstract
Asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, also called chronic airflow limitation (CAL)) are the most frequent diagnoses in patients with intrathoracic airways obstruction [1]. Often these patients show a spontaneous variability in the degree of airways obstruction, which can be documented by serial lung function measurements. Large variability in the degree of airways obstruction is indicative of an increased susceptibility of the patient to environmental stimuli that cause acute airway narrowing. Knowledge of the potential severity of these episodes of acute airways obstruction is of clinical interest. Therefore, several quantitative measures of the response of the airways to bronchoconstrictors in vivo have been advocated over the past two decades. The objective of the present guidelines is to address the methodological issues of the various available techniques, and to provide up-to-date international guidelines on standardization. The present recommendations might not represent the potentially best methodologies. However, they do represent the currently validated techniques, by which interchangeable results can be obtained among laboratories. Variable airways obstruction can be mimicked in the laboratory by challenge tests with bronchoconstrictive stimuli (fig. 1) [2]. This enables one to measure the degree of the so-called «airway responsiveness» of the subject to a particular agent. Since the bronchoconstrictive response varies from one stimulus to another, one needs to specify the challenging agent. Therefore, the term «nonspecific» airway responsiveness should be abandoned. Figure 1– Dose-response curves to inhaled methacholine using the dosimeter method in 3 subjects. Airway hyperresponsiveness in asthma is characterised by a leftward shift of the curve (hypersensitivity), a steeper slope (hyperreactivity), and an increase in maximal response (excessive airway narrowing). Modified from de Pee et al. [243] with permission. Airway hyperresponsiveness refers to an exaggerated response to the bronchoconstrictor. This is reflected by an increased sensitivity to the stimulus, which …
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lung volumes and forced ventilatory flows
Quanjer, P. H., Tammeling, G. J., Cotes, J. E., Pedersen, O. F., Peslin, R., & Yernault, J.-C. (1993) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09041950.005s1693 · Cited by 5,318
Self-citationMeasurement in Medicine: The Analysis of Method Comparison Studies
Altman, D. G., & Bland, J. M. (1983) · The Statistician · doi:10.2307/2987937 · Cited by 4,300
(1987) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/136.1.225 · Cited by 2,234
Bronchial reactivity to inhaled histamine: a method and clinical survey
COCKCROFT, D. W., KILLIAN, D. N., MELLON, J. J. A., & HARGREAVE, F. E. (1977) · Clinical & Experimental Allergy · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2222.1977.tb01448.x · Cited by 1,840
Self-citationAllergy: Principles and Practice.
(1991) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-114-9-817_10 · Cited by 1,696
Standardization of bronchial inhalation challenge procedures
Chai, H., Farr, R. S., Froehlich, L. A., Mathison, D. A., McLean, J. A., Rosenthal, R. R., Sheffer, A. L., Spector, S. L., & Townley, R. G. (1975) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/0091-6749(75)90107-4 · Cited by 1,453
O’Hollaren, M. T., Bardana, E. J., & Montanaro, A. J. (1991) · Cited by 1,355
Standardized lung function testing.
Thornton, J. C., & Miller, A. (1984) · PubMed · Cited by 1,310
Mucosal Inflammation in Asthma
Djukanović, R., Roche, W. R., Wilson, J. W., Beasley, C. R. W., Twentyman, O. P., Howarth, P. H., & Holgate, S. T. (1990) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/142.2.434 · Cited by 1,280
Lewis (1990) · doi:10.1056/nejm199009063231006 · Cited by 1,200
Cited by
Allergic Rhinitis and Its Impact on Asthma
Bousquet, J., van Cauwenberge, P., & Khaltaev, N. (2001) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1067/mai.2001.118891 · Cited by 3,588
ATS/ACCP statement on cardiopulmonary exercise testing
(2003) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.167.2.211 · Cited by 3,026
Reddel, H. K., Taylor, D. R., Bateman, E. D., Boulet, L.-P., Boushey, H. A., Busse, W. W., Casale, T. B., Chanez, P., Enright, P. L., Gibson, P. G., et al. (2009) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/rccm.200801-060st · Cited by 1,918
Self-citationDekhuijzen, P. N., Aben, K. K., Dekker, I., Aarts, L. P., Wielders, P. L., van Herwaarden, C. L., & Bast, A. (1996) · American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.154.3.8810624 · Cited by 503
Risk factors of frequent exacerbations in difficult-to-treat asthma
ten Brinke, A., Sterk, P. J., Masclee, A. A. M., Spinhoven, P., Schmidt, J. T., Zwinderman, A. H., Rabe, K. F., & Bel, E. H. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00037905 · Cited by 490
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sterk, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Quanjer, P. H., Cockcroft, D. W., O'Byrne, P. M., Anderson, S. D., Juniper, E. F., & Malo, J.-L.
- Venue
- European Respiratory Journal
- Publisher
- European Respiratory Society (ERS)
- Published
- 1993-03-01
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- Suppl 16
- Pages
- 53-83
- ISSN
- 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
- 1399-3003
- OpenAlex
- W121149184
- Cited by
- 1,049
- References
- 128
- FWCI
- 14.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/09041950.053s1693
- The paper
- Sterk, P. J., Fabbri, L. M., Quanjer, P. H., Cockcroft, D. W., O'Byrne, P. M., Anderson, S. D., Juniper, E. F., & Malo, J.-L. (1993). Standardized challenge testing with pharmacological, physical and sensitizing stimuli in adults. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/09041950.053s1693
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.