Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 490

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Air pollution, lung function and COPD: results from the population-based UK Biobank study

Open access
Doiron, Dany, de Hoogh, Kees, Probst-Hensch, Nicole, Fortier, Isabel, Cai, Yutong, De Matteis, Sara, Hansell, Anna L.·2019·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Ambient air pollution increases the risk of respiratory mortality, but evidence for impacts on lung function and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is less well established. The aim was to evaluate whether ambient air pollution is associated with lung function and COPD, and explore potential vulnerability factors. We used UK Biobank data on 303 887 individuals aged 40–69 years, with complete covariate data and valid lung function measures. Cross-sectional analyses examined associations of land use regression-based estimates of particulate matter (particles with a 50% cut-off aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 and 10 µm: PM 2.5 and PM 10, respectively; and coarse particles with diameter between 2.5 μm and 10 μm: PM coarse) and nitrogen dioxide (NO 2) concentrations with forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1), forced vital capacity (FVC), the FEV 1/FVC ratio and COPD (FEV 1/FVC <lower limit of normal). Effect modification was investigated for sex, age, obesity, smoking status, household income, asthma status and occupations previously linked to COPD. Higher exposures to each pollutant were significantly associated with lower lung function. A 5 µg·m−3 increase in PM 2.5 concentration was associated with lower FEV 1(−83.13 mL, 95% CI −92.50– −73.75 mL) and FVC (−62.62 mL, 95% CI −73.91– −51.32 mL). COPD prevalence was associated with higher concentrations of PM 2.5(OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.42–1.62, per 5 µg·m−3), PM 10(OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.00–1.16, per 5 µg·m−3) and NO 2(OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.10–1.14, per 10 µg·m−3), but not with PM coarse. Stronger lung function associations were seen for males, individuals from lower income households, and “at-risk” occupations, and higher COPD associations were seen for obese, lower income, and non-asthmatic participants. Ambient air pollution was associated with lower lung function and increased COPD prevalence in this large study.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.02140-2018

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 490

Metadata

Authors
Doiron, D., de Hoogh, K., Probst-Hensch, N., Fortier, I., Cai, Y., De Matteis, S., & Hansell, A. L.
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2019-07
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
1802140
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2947803926
Cited by
490
References
35
FWCI
19.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Air pollution, lung function and COPD: results from the population-based UK Biobank study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1183/13993003.02140-2018
The paper
Doiron, D., de Hoogh, K., Probst-Hensch, N., Fortier, I., Cai, Y., De Matteis, S., & Hansell, A. L. (2019). Air pollution, lung function and COPD: results from the population-based UK Biobank study. European Respiratory Journal. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02140-2018

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.