Cited by 66Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyCOVID-19 diagnosis using AIArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

An evaluation of automated chest radiography reading software for tuberculosis screening among public- and private-sector patients

Open access
Rahman, Md Toufiq, Codlin, Andrew J., Rahman, Md Mahfuzur, Nahar, Ayenun, Reja, Mehdi, Islam, Tariqul, Qin, Zhi Zhen, Khan, Md Abdus Shakur +2 more·2017·European Respiratory Journal

Abstract

Computer-aided reading (CAR) of medical images is becoming increasingly common, but few studies exist for CAR in tuberculosis (TB). We designed a prospective study evaluating CAR for chest radiography (CXR) as a triage tool before Xpert MTB/RIF (Xpert). Consecutively enrolled adults in Dhaka, Bangladesh, with TB symptoms received CXR and Xpert. Each image was scored by CAR and graded by a radiologist. We compared CAR with the radiologist for sensitivity and specificity, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calculated the potential Xpert tests saved. A total of 18 036 individuals were enrolled. TB prevalence by Xpert was 15%. The radiologist graded 49% of CXRs as abnormal, resulting in 91% sensitivity and 58% specificity. At a similar sensitivity, CAR had a lower specificity (41%), saving fewer (36%) Xpert tests. The AUC for CAR was 0.74 (95% CI 0.73–0.75). CAR performance declined with increasing age. The radiologist grading was superior across all sub-analyses. Using CAR can save Xpert tests, but the radiologist's specificity was superior. Differentiated CAR thresholds may be required for different populations. Access to, and costs of, human readers must be considered when deciding to use CAR software. More studies are needed to evaluate CAR using different screening approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.02159-2016

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 29

  1. [1]van't Hoog AH, Onozaki I, Lonnroth K Choosing algorithms for TB screening: a modelling study to compare yield, predictive value and diagnostic burden. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14: 532. 25326816 PMC4287425
  2. [2]Somashekar N, Chadha VK, Praseeja P, et al. Role of pre-Xpert screening using chest X-ray in early diagnosis of smear-negative pulmonary tuberculosis. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2014; 18: 1243– 1244. 25216840
  3. [3]Pande T, Pai M, Khan FA, et al. Use of chest radiography in the 22 highest tuberculosis burden countries. Eur Respir J 2015; 46: 1816– 1819. 26405288
  4. [4]Pedrazzoli D, Lalli M, Boccia D, et al. Can tuberculosis patients in resource-constrained settings afford chest radiography? Eur Respir J 2017 47: 1601877. 28182572
  5. [5]WHO Expert Committee on Tuberculosis. Ninth Report. WHO Technical Report Series, No. 552. Geneva, World Health Organization, 1974. 4216173
  6. [6]Waaler HT Descriptions of the study material and organization of the study. Bull Int Union Tuberc 1968; 41: 110– 114. 5710243
  7. [7]Pinto LM, Pai M, Dheda K, et al. Scoring systems using chest radiographic features for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in adults: a systematic review. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 480– 494. 23222871
  8. [8]Karssemeijer N, Bluekens AM, Beijerinck D, et al. Breast cancer screening results 5 years after introduction of digital mammography in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2009; 253: 353– 358. 19703851
  9. [9]van Ginneken B, Stegmann MB, Loog M Segmentation of anatomical structures in chest radiographs using supervised methods: a comparative study on a public database. Med Image Anal 2006; 10: 19– 40. 15919232
  10. [10]Breuninger M, van Ginneken B, Philipsen RH, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computer-aided detection of pulmonary tuberculosis in chest radiographs: a validation study from sub-Saharan Africa. PloS One 2014; 9: e106381. 25192172 PMC4156349
  11. [11]Maduskar P, Muyoyeta M, Ayles H, et al. Detection of tuberculosis with digital chest radiography: automatic reading versus interpretation by clinical officers. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2013; 17: 1613– 1620. 24200278
  12. [12]Muyoyeta M, Maduskar P, Moyo M, et al. The sensitivity and specificity of using a computer aided diagnosis program for automatically scoring chest X-rays of presumptive TB patients compared with Xpert MTB/RIF in Lusaka Zambia. PLoS One 2014; 9: e93757. 24705629 PMC3976315
  13. [13]Steiner A, Mangu C, van den Hombergh J, et al. Screening for pulmonary tuberculosis in a Tanzanian prison and computer-aided interpretation of chest X-rays. Public Health Action 2015; 5: 249– 254. 26767179 PMC4682617
  14. [14]Philipsen RHHM, Sánchez CI, Maduskar P, et al. Automated chest-radiography as a triage for Xpert testing in resource-constrained settings: a prospective study of diagnostic accuracy and costs. Sci Rep 2015; 5: 12215. 26212560 PMC4515744
  15. [15]Pande T, Cohen C, Pai M, et al. Computer aided detection of pulmonary tuberculosis on digital chest radiographs: a systematic review. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2016; 20: 1226– 1230. 27510250
  16. [16]Pantoja A, Fitzpatrick C, Vassall A, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF for diagnosis of TB and drug-resistant TB: a cost and affordability analysis. Eur Respir J 2013; 42: 708– 820. 23258774
  17. [17]Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, et al. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; 1: CD009593. PMC4470349 24448973
  18. [18]Steingart KR, Henry M, Ng V, et al. Fluorescence versus conventional sputum smear microscopy for tuberculosis: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2006; 6: 570– 581. 16931408
  19. [19]World Health Organization. Automated real-time nucleic acid amplification technology for rapid and simultaneous detection of tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance: Xpert MTB/RIF assay for the diagnosis of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary TB in adults and children. Policy update. WHO/HTM/TB/2013.16 Geneva, WHO, 2013. 25473701
  20. [20]Kik SV, Denkinger CM, Casenghi M, et al. Tuberculosis diagnostics: which target product profiles should be prioritised? Eur Respir J 2014; 44: 537– 540. 24696110
  21. [21]Theron G, Pooran A, Peter J, et al. Do adjunct tuberculosis tests, when combined with Xpert MTB/RIF, improve accuracy and the cost of diagnosis in a resource-poor setting? Eur Respir J 2012; 40: 161– 168. 22075479 PMC5523948
  22. [22]Albert H, Nathavitharana RR, Isaacs C, et al. Development, roll-out and impact of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis: what lessons have we learnt and how can we do better? Eur Respir J 2016; 48: 516– 525. 27418550 PMC4967565
  23. [24]Hossain S, Zaman K, Quaiyum A, et al. Care seeking in tuberculosis: results from a countrywide cluster randomised survey in Bangladesh. BMJ Open 2014; 4: e004766. PMC4039849 24871537
  24. [25]Shaikh B, Hatcher J Health seeking behaviour and health services utilization trends in National Health Survey of Pakistan: what needs to be done? J Pak Med Assoc 2007; 57: 411– 414. 17902526
  25. [26]Puri L, Oghor C, Denkinger CM, et al. Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculosis testing: access and price in highly privatised health markets. Lancet Glob Health 2016; 4: e94– e95. 26823226
  26. [27]Qin ZZ, Pai M, Van Gemert W, et al. How is Xpert MTB/RIF being implemented in 22 high tuberculosis burden countries? Eur Respir J 2015; 45: 549– 554. 25359338
  27. [28]Robin X, Turck N, Hainard A, et al. pROC: an open-source package for R and S+ to analyze and compare ROC curves. BMC Bioinformatics 2011; 12: 77. 21414208 PMC3068975
  28. [31]Onozaki I, Law I, Sismanidis C, et al. National tuberculosis prevalence surveys in Asia, 1990–2012: an overview of results and lessons learned. Trop Med Int Health 2015; 20: 1128– 1145. 25943163
  29. [32]Wells WA, Ge CF, Patel N, et al. Size and usage patterns of private TB drug markets in the high burden countries. PLoS One 2011; 6: e18964. 21573227 PMC3087727

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rahman, M. T., Codlin, A. J., Rahman, M. M., Nahar, A., Reja, M., Islam, T., Qin, Z. Z., Khan, M. A. S., Banu, S., & Creswell, J.
Affiliations
  • International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research (BD)
  • National Institute of Neurosciences & Hospital (BD)
  • National Institute of Diseases of the Chest and Hospital (BD)
Corresponding author
Creswell, Jacob
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2017-05
Volume
49
Issue
5
Pages
1602159
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2615068833
Cited by
66
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Global Affairs Canada
  • UNITAID
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
tuberculosis screening, chest radiography, Xpert MTB/RIF, triage, diagnostic accuracy, radiologist comparison, age-related performance decline
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Bangladesh, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, ROC Curve, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Radiography, Thoracic, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Private Sector, Tuberculosis, Multidrug-Resistant, Area Under Curve, Extensively Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review