Cited by 7Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational and environmental lung diseases

Circulating biomarkers and progression of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: data from the INMARK trial

Open access
Maher, Toby M., Jenkins, R. Gisli, Cottin, Vincent, Nishioka, Yasuhiko, Noth, Imre, Selman, Moisés, Song, Jin Woo, Ittrich, Carina +3 more·2024·ERJ Open Research

Abstract

Background: We used data from the INMARK trial to investigate associations between circulating biomarkers of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover, inflammation and epithelial dysfunction and disease progression in subjects with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). Methods: Subjects with IPF and forced vital capacity (FVC) ≥80% predicted were randomised 1:2 to receive nintedanib 150 mg twice daily or placebo for 12 weeks followed by open-label nintedanib for 40 weeks. Associations between baseline biomarker levels and the proportion of subjects with disease progression (decline in FVC ≥10% predicted or death) over 52 weeks were assessed in subjects randomised to placebo using logistic regression. Associations between baseline demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels and disease progression over 52 weeks were analysed using multivariate models. Results: Of 230 subjects who received placebo for 12 weeks then open-label nintedanib for 40 weeks, 70 (30.4%) had disease progression over 52 weeks. Baseline levels of CRPM (C-reactive protein (CRP) degraded by matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-1/8), C3M (collagen 3 degraded by MMP-9), CRP, KL-6 (Krebs von den Lungen-6) and SP-D (surfactant protein D) were not significantly associated with disease progression over 52 weeks in analyses corrected for multiple comparisons. In models including only baseline demographic/clinical characteristics, 61.2–64.2% of subjects were correctly classified as having or not having disease progression over 52 weeks. When both demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels were included in the models, 50.0–64.5% of the test set were correctly classified. Conclusions: Among subjects with IPF and preserved FVC, multivariate models based on demographic/clinical characteristics and biomarker levels at baseline did not provide an accurate prediction of which patients would progress.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/23120541.00335-2023

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The 5% drop in SP-D is comparable to decreases described in standard of care IPF drug trials after longer treatment durations, notably the CAPACITY study of pirfenidone (5% at 12 weeks) and the INMARK study of nintedanib (4% at 12 weeks).

    “the 5% drop in SP-D is comparable to decreases described in standard of care IPF drug trials after longer treatment durations, notably the CAPACITY study of pirfenidone (5% at 12 weeks)35 and the INMARK study of nintedanib (4% at 12 weeks)36,37”

    From Inhaled LTI-03 for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a randomized dose escalation study (2026) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Introduction identifies INMARK as a trial of nintedanib and circulating biomarkers in IPF, and Methods > Trial design confirms a 12-week nintedanib treatment period. The passages from our copy do not report a 4% decrease in SP-D after nintedanib; the Results discuss SP-D in relation to disease progression instead. The CAPACITY figure is attached to a different citation. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 21

  1. [1]Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Richeldi L, et al. Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (an update) and progressive pulmonary fibrosis in adults: an official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT clinical practice guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2022; 205: e18– e47. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202202-0399ST 35486072 PMC9851481 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [2]Selman M, Pardo A. The leading role of epithelial cells in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Cell Signal 2020; 66: 109482. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.109482 31760172 · DOI
  3. [3]Jenkins RG, Simpson JK, Saini G, et al. Longitudinal change in collagen degradation biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: an analysis from the prospective, multicentre PROFILE study. Lancet Respir Med 2015; 3: 462– 472. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00048-X 25770676 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Hamai K, Iwamoto H, Ishikawa N, et al. Comparative study of circulating MMP-7, CCL18, KL-6, SP-A, and SP-D as disease markers of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Dis Markers 2016; 2016: 4759040. doi: 10.1155/2016/4759040 27293304 PMC4886062 · DOI
  5. [6]Wang K, Ju Q, Cao J, et al. Impact of serum SP-A and SP-D levels on comparison and prognosis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine 2017; 96: e7083. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000007083 28591049 PMC5466227 · DOI
  6. [7]Jessen H, Hoyer N, Prior TS, et al. Longitudinal serological assessment of type VI collagen turnover is related to progression in a real-world cohort of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. BMC Pulm Med 2021; 21: 382. doi: 10.1186/s12890-021-01684-3 34814865 PMC8609852 · DOI
  7. [8]Wakamatsu K, Nagata N, Kumazoe H, et al. Prognostic value of serial serum KL-6 measurements in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respir Investig 2017; 55: 16– 23. doi: 10.1016/j.resinv.2016.09.003 28012488 · DOI
  8. [9]Majewski S, Szewczyk K, Żal A, et al. Serial measurements of circulating KL-6, SP-D, MMP-7, CA19-9, CA-125, CCL18, and periostin in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis receiving antifibrotic therapy: an exploratory study. J Clin Med 2021; 10: 3864. doi: 10.3390/jcm10173864 34501312 PMC8432145 · DOI
  9. [10]Chung C, Kim J, Cho HS, et al. Baseline serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 as a biomarker for the disease progression in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 8564. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-12399-8 35595812 PMC9123161 · DOI
  10. [12]Maher TM, Stowasser S, Nishioka Y, et al. Biomarkers of extracellular matrix turnover in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis given nintedanib (INMARK study): a randomised, placebo-controlled study. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 7: 771– 779. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(19)30255-3 31326319 · DOI
  11. [13]Raghu G, Collard HR, Egan JJ, et al. An official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT statement: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis and management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2011; 183: 788– 824. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2009-040GL 21471066 PMC5450933 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [14]Leeming DJ, Sand JM, Nielsen MJ, et al. Serological investigation of the collagen degradation profile of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Biomark Insights 2012; 7: 119– 126. doi: 10.4137/BMI.S9415 23012495 PMC3448496 · DOI
  13. [15]Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995; 57: 289– 300. doi: 10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x · DOI · Paper page
  14. [16]Meinshausen N, Bühlmann P. Stability selection. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 2010; 72: 417– 473. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00740.x · DOI
  15. [17]Skjøt-Arkil H, Schett G, Zhang C, et al. Investigation of two novel biochemical markers of inflammation, matrix metalloproteinase and cathepsin generated fragments of C-reactive protein, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012; 30: 371– 379. 22339813
  16. [18]Rosas IO, Richards TJ, Konishi K, et al. MMP1 and MMP7 as potential peripheral blood biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e93. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0050093 18447576 PMC2346504 · DOI
  17. [19]Todd JL, Vinisko R, Liu Y, et al. Circulating matrix metalloproteinases and tissue metalloproteinase inhibitors in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in the multicenter IPF-PRO Registry cohort. BMC Pulm Med 2020; 20: 64. doi: 10.1186/s12890-020-1103-4 32171287 PMC7071646 · DOI
  18. [20]Song JW, Do KH, Jang SJ, et al. Blood biomarkers MMP-7 and SP-A: predictors of outcome in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2013; 143: 1422– 1429. doi: 10.1378/chest.11-2735 23715088 · DOI
  19. [22]Kinder BW, Brown KK, McCormack FX, et al. Serum surfactant protein-A is a strong predictor of early mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2009; 135: 1557– 1563. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2209 19255294 PMC2716710 · DOI
  20. [24]Hoyer N, Jessen H, Prior TS, et al. High turnover of types III and VI collagen in progressive idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Respirology 2021; 26: 582– 589. doi: 10.1111/resp.14056 33834579 · DOI
  21. [25]Stainer A, Faverio P, Busnelli S, et al. Molecular biomarkers in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: state of the art and future directions. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22: 6255. doi: 10.3390/ijms22126255 34200784 PMC8230407 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maher, T. M., Jenkins, R. G., Cottin, V., Nishioka, Y., Noth, I., Selman, M., Song, J. W., Ittrich, C., Diefenbach, C., Stowasser, S., & White, E. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern California (US)
  • Lyon 1 Université (FR)
  • Tokushima University (JP)
  • University of Virginia (US)
  • Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Respiratorias (MX)
  • Asan Medical Center (KR)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (Germany) (DE)
  • Boehringer Ingelheim (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Maher, Toby M.
Venue
ERJ Open Research
Published
2024-04-04
Volume
10
Issue
4
Pages
00335-2023
ISSN
2312-0541 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4393930626
Cited by
7
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • ERJ Open Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Boehringer Ingelheim (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Occupational and environmental lung diseases
Keywords
idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, circulating biomarkers, disease progression, nintedanib, extracellular matrix turnover, MMP-9, C-reactive protein, KL-6, surfactant protein D, collagen degradation, inflammation, epithelial dysfunction, disease progression prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review