Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 288

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes

Rosenstock, J., Aguilar-Salinas, C., Klein, E., Nepal, S., List, J., Chen, R., for the CV181-011 Study Investigators·2009·Current Medical Research and Opinion

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and inadequate glycemic control. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This study included a main treatment cohort (MTC) with 401 patients (HbA(1c) > or = 7% and < or =10%) randomized and treated with oral saxagliptin 2.5, 5, or 10 mg once daily or placebo for 24 weeks and a separate open-label cohort (OLC) with 66 patients (HbA(1c) > 10% and < or =12%) who received saxagliptin 10 mg once daily for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was HbA(1c) change from baseline to week 24. Secondary endpoints included change from baseline to week 24 in fasting plasma glucose (FPG), proportion of patients achieving HbA(1c) < 7%, and changes in postprandial glucose area-under-the-curve (PPG-AUC). Efficacy analyses for continuous variables were performed using an ANCOVA model with last-observation-carried-forward methodology. RESULTS: In the MTC, saxagliptin demonstrated statistically significant decreases in adjusted mean HbA(1c) changes from baseline (mean, 7.9%) to week 24 (-0.43%, -0.46%, -0.54%) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, vs. +0.19% for placebo (all p < 0.0001). Adjusted mean FPG was significantly reduced from baseline (-15, -9, -17 mg/dL) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, vs. +6 mg/dL for placebo (p = 0.0002, p = 0.0074, p < 0.0001, respectively). More saxagliptin-treated patients achieved HbA(1c) < 7% at week 24 (35% [p = NS], 38% [p = 0.0443], 41% [p = 0.0133]) for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg, respectively, than placebo (24%). PPG-AUC was reduced for saxagliptin 2.5, 5, and 10 mg (-6868, -6896, -8084 mg x min/dL, respectively) vs. placebo (-647 mg x min/dL) with statistical significance demonstrated for saxagliptin 5 mg (p = 0.0002) and 10 mg (p < 0.0001). HbA(1c), FPG, and PPG-AUC reductions were also observed in the OLC at 24 weeks. In the MTC, adverse event frequency was similar across all study arms. No cases of confirmed hypoglycemia (symptoms, with fingerstick glucose < or =50 mg/dL) were observed in either cohort. Saxagliptin was not associated with weight gain. Study limitations included the lack of a control group for the OLC and the use of prespecified rescue criteria, which limited the exposure time during which patients could remain on their originally randomized medication without the introduction of additional antihyperglycemic rescue treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Once-daily saxagliptin monotherapy for 24 weeks was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinically meaningful reductions in key parameters of glycemic control vs. placebo. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials NCT00121641

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1185/03007990903178735

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Rosenstock, J., Aguilar-Salinas, C., Klein, E., Nepal, S., List, J., Chen, R., & for the CV181-011 Study Investigators
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Published
2009-08-04
Volume
25
Issue
10
Pages
2401-2411
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
OpenAlex
W1970125713
Cited by
288
References
4
FWCI
28.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1185/03007990903178735
The paper
Rosenstock, J., Aguilar-Salinas, C., Klein, E., Nepal, S., List, J., Chen, R., & for the CV181-011 Study Investigators. (2009). Effect of saxagliptin monotherapy in treatment-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes. Current Medical Research and Opinion. https://doi.org/10.1185/03007990903178735

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.