Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 299

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of β ‐cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial

Del Prato, S., Barnett, A. H., Huisman, H., Neubacher, D., Woerle, H.‐J., Dugi, K. A.·2011·Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism

Abstract

Aim: To assess the safety and efficacy of the potent and selective dipeptidyl peptidase‐4 inhibitor linagliptin 5 mg when given for 24 weeks to patients with type 2 diabetes who were either treatment‐naive or who had received one oral antidiabetes drug (OAD). Methods: This multicentre, randomized, parallel group, phase III study compared linagliptin treatment (5 mg once daily, n = 336) with placebo (n = 167) for 24 weeks in type 2 diabetes patients. Before randomization, patients pretreated with one OAD underwent a washout period of 6 weeks, which included a placebo run‐in period during the last 2 weeks. Patients previously untreated with an OAD underwent a 2‐week placebo run‐in period. The primary endpoint was the change in HbA1c from baseline after 24 weeks of treatment. Results: Linagliptin treatment resulted in a placebo‐corrected change in HbA1c from baseline of −0.69% (p < 0.0001) at 24 weeks. In patients with baseline HbA1c ≥ 9.0%, the adjusted reduction in HbA1c was 1.01% (p < 0.0001). Patients treated with linagliptin were more likely to achieve a reduction in HbA1c of ≥0.5% at 24 weeks than those in the placebo arm (47.1 and 19.0%, respectively; odds ratio, OR = 4.2, p < 0.0001). Fasting plasma glucose improved by −1.3 mmol/l (p < 0.0001) with linagliptin vs. placebo, and linagliptin produced an adjusted mean reduction from baseline after 24 weeks in 2‐h postprandial glucose of −3.2 mmol/l (p < 0.0001). Statistically significant and relevant treatment differences were observed for proinsulin/insulin ratio ( p = 0.025), Homeostasis Model Assessment‐%B (p = 0.049) and disposition index (p = 0.0005). There was no excess of hypoglycaemic episodes with linagliptin vs. placebo and no patient required third‐party intervention. Mild or moderate renal impairment did not influence the trough plasma levels of linagliptin. Conclusions: Monotherapy with linagliptin produced a significant, clinically meaningful and sustained improvement in glycaemic control, accompanied by enhanced parameters of β ‐cell function. The safety profile of linagliptin was comparable with that of placebo.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01350.x

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 299

Metadata

Authors
Del Prato, S., Barnett, A. H., Huisman, H., Neubacher, D., Woerle, H. ‐., & Dugi, K. A.
Venue
Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01-24
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
258-267
ISSN
  • 1462-8902 (ISSN-L)
  • 1463-1326
OpenAlex
W2140480989
Cited by
299
References
22
FWCI
27.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of β ‐cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01350.x
The paper
Del Prato, S., Barnett, A. H., Huisman, H., Neubacher, D., Woerle, H. ‐., & Dugi, K. A. (2011). Effect of linagliptin monotherapy on glycaemic control and markers of β ‐cell function in patients with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2010.01350.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.