Cited by 937Protein Structure and DynamicsMachine Learning in BioinformaticsRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

Simulating 500 million years of evolution with a language model

Open access
Hayes, Thomas, Rao, Roshan, Akin, Halil, Sofroniew, Nicholas J., Oktay, Deniz, Lin, Zeming, Verkuil, Robert, Tran, Vincent Q. +17 more·2025·Science

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

More than 3 billion years of evolution have produced an image of biology encoded into the space of natural proteins. Here, we show that language models trained at scale on evolutionary data can generate functional proteins that are far away from known proteins. We present ESM3, a frontier multimodal generative language model that reasons over the sequence, structure, and function of proteins. ESM3 can follow complex prompts combining its modalities and is highly responsive to alignment to improve its fidelity. We have prompted ESM3 to generate fluorescent proteins. Among the generations that we synthesized, we found a bright fluorescent protein at a far distance (58% sequence identity) from known fluorescent proteins, which we estimate is equivalent to simulating 500 million years of evolution.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.ads0018

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Language-model-created proteins such as esmGFP or OpenCrispr1 are different from any of their naturally occurring counterparts.

    “This type of evaluation is already considered within the molecular design space because language-model-created proteins, such as esmGFP52 or OpenCrispr1,53 highlight how different they are from any of their naturally occurring counterparts.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hayes, T., Rao, R., Akin, H., Sofroniew, N. J., Oktay, D., Lin, Z., Verkuil, R., Tran, V. Q., Deaton, J., Wiggert, M., Badkundri, R., Shafkat, I., Gong, J., Derry, A., Molina, R. S., Thomas, N., Khan, Y. A., Mishra, C., Kim, C., Bartie, L. J., Nemeth, M., Hsu, P. D., Sercu, T., Candido, S., & Rives, A.
Affiliations
  • EvolutionaryScale, PBC, New York, NY, USA.
  • Arc Research Institute (US)
Corresponding author
Rives, Alexander
Venue
Science
Published
2025-02-21
Volume
387
Issue
6736
Pages
850-858
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W4406440058
Cited by
937
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 486 · 2025: 382 · 2024: 65 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
261.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion, public-domain)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
protein evolution, generative language models, multimodal language models, protein design, fluorescent proteins, protein structure prediction, protein function, evolutionary simulation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Computer Simulation, Language, Luminescent Proteins, Proteins, Sequence Alignment, Evolution, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review