The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the large number of hypothesis tests performed during the process of routine analysis of microarray data, a multiple testing adjustment is certainly warranted. However, when the number of tests is very large and the proportion of differentially expressed genes is relatively low, the use of a multiple testing adjustment can result in very low power to detect those genes which are truly differentially expressed. Filtering allows for a reduction in the number of tests and a corresponding increase in power. Common filtering methods include filtering by variance, average signal or MAS detection call (for Affymetrix arrays). We study the effects of filtering in combination with the Benjamini-Hochberg method for false discovery rate control and q-value for false discovery rate estimation. RESULTS: Three case studies are used to compare three different filtering methods in combination with the two false discovery rate methods and three different preprocessing methods. For the case studies considered, filtering by detection call and variance (on the original scale) consistently led to an increase in the number of differentially expressed genes identified. On the other hand, filtering by variance on the log2 scale had a detrimental effect when paired with MAS5 or PLIER preprocessing methods, even when the testing was done on the log2 scale. A simulation study was done to further examine the effect of filtering by variance. We find that filtering by variance leads to higher power, often with a decrease in false discovery rate, when paired with either of the false discovery rate methods considered. This holds regardless of the proportion of genes which are differentially expressed or whether we assume dependence or independence among genes. CONCLUSION: The case studies show that both detection call and variance filtering are viable methods of filtering which can increase the number of differentially expressed genes identified. The simulation study demonstrates that when paired with a false discovery rate method, filtering by variance can increase power while still controlling the false discovery rate. Filtering out 50% of probe sets seems reasonable as long as the majority of genes are not expected to be differentially expressed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical significance for genomewide studies
Storey, J. D., & Tibshirani, R. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1530509100 · Cited by 9,692
Cited by
Using MetaboAnalyst 3.0 for Comprehensive Metabolomics Data Analysis
Xia, J., & Wishart, D. S. (2016) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.11 · Cited by 1,544
American Gut: an Open Platform for Citizen-Science Microbiome Research
McDonalda, D., Hyde, E., Debelius, J. W., Morton, J. T., Gonzalez, A., Ackermann, G., Aksenov, A. A., Behsaz, B., Brennan, C., Chen, Y., et al. (2018) · doi:10.1101/277970 · Cited by 878
Multiple hypothesis testing in genomics
Goeman, J. J., & Solari, A. (2014) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.6082 · Cited by 375
Class-imbalanced classifiers for high-dimensional data
Lin, W.-J., & Chen, J. J. (2013) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbs006 · Cited by 284
Optimizing the noise versus bias trade-off for Illumina Whole Genome Expression Beadchips
Shi, W., Oshlack, A., & Smyth, G. K. (2010) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkq871 · Cited by 225
Metadata
- Authors
- Hackstadt, A. J., & Hess, A. M.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2009-01-08
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 11-11
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2134955300
- Cited by
- 290
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-10-11
- The paper
- Hackstadt, A. J., & Hess, A. M. (2009). Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-11
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.