The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Evolutionary trees are central to a wide range of biological studies. In many of these studies, tree nodes and branches need to be associated (or annotated) with various attributes. For example, in studies concerned with organismal relationships, tree nodes are associated with taxonomic names, whereas tree branches have lengths and oftentimes support values. Gene trees used in comparative genomics or phylogenomics are usually annotated with taxonomic information, genome-related data, such as gene names and functional annotations, as well as events such as gene duplications, speciations, or exon shufflings, combined with information related to the evolutionary tree itself. The data standards currently used for evolutionary trees have limited capacities to incorporate such annotations of different data types. RESULTS: We developed a XML language, named phyloXML, for describing evolutionary trees, as well as various associated data items. PhyloXML provides elements for commonly used items, such as branch lengths, support values, taxonomic names, and gene names and identifiers. By using "property" elements, phyloXML can be adapted to novel and unforeseen use cases. We also developed various software tools for reading, writing, conversion, and visualization of phyloXML formatted data. CONCLUSION: PhyloXML is an XML language defined by a complete schema in XSD that allows storing and exchanging the structures of evolutionary trees as well as associated data. More information about phyloXML itself, the XSD schema, as well as tools implementing and supporting phyloXML, is available at http://www.phyloxml.org.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Biopython: freely available python tools for computational molecular biology and bioinformatics
Cock, P. J. A., Antao, T., Chang, J. T., Chapman, B. A., Cox, C. J., Dalke, A., Friedberg, I., Hamelryck, T., Kauff, F., Wilczynski, B., et al. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp163 · Cited by 6,080
Cited by
MAFFT online service: multiple sequence alignment, interactive sequence choice and visualization
Katoh, K., Rozewicki, J., & Yamada, K. D. (2019) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbx108 · Cited by 8,909
Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19
Bastard, P., Rosen, L. B., Zhang, Q., Michailidis, E., Hoffmann, H.-H., Zhang, Y., Dorgham, K., Philippot, Q., Rosain, J., Béziat, V., et al. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abd4585 · Cited by 2,662
Interactive Tree Of Life v2: online annotation and display of phylogenetic trees made easy
Letunic, I., & Bork, P. (2011) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr201 · Cited by 1,457
IMG: the integrated microbial genomes database and comparative analysis system
Markowitz, V. M., Chen, I.-M. A., Palaniappan, K., Chu, K., Szeto, E., Grechkin, Y., Ratner, A., Jacob, B., Huang, J., Williams, P., et al. (2012) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkr1044 · Cited by 1,311
Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin
NIH Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program, Findley, K., Oh, J., Yang, J., Conlan, S., Deming, C., Meyer, J. A., Schoenfeld, D., Nomicos, E., Park, M., et al. (2013) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature12171 · Cited by 1,206
Metadata
- Authors
- Han, M. V., & Zmasek, C. M.
- Venue
- BMC Bioinformatics
- Published
- 2009-10-27
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 356-356
- ISSN
- 1471-2105 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2132247062
- Cited by
- 545
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1471-2105-10-356
- The paper
- Han, M. V., & Zmasek, C. M. (2009). phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-10-356
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.