Cited by 1,206Nail Diseases and TreatmentsDermatology and Skin DiseasesMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology

Topographic diversity of fungal and bacterial communities in human skin

Open access
NIH Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program, Findley, Keisha, Oh, Julia, Yang, Joy, Conlan, Sean, Deming, Clayton, Meyer, Jennifer A., Schoenfeld, Deborah +4 more·2013·Nature

Abstract

Traditional culture-based methods have incompletely defined the microbial landscape of common recalcitrant human fungal skin diseases, including athlete's foot and toenail infections. Skin protects humans from invasion by pathogenic microorganisms and provides a home for diverse commensal microbiota. Bacterial genomic sequence data have generated novel hypotheses about species and community structures underlying human disorders. However, microbial diversity is not limited to bacteria; microorganisms such as fungi also have major roles in microbial community stability, human health and disease. Genomic methodologies to identify fungal species and communities have been limited compared with those that are available for bacteria. Fungal evolution can be reconstructed with phylogenetic markers, including ribosomal RNA gene regions and other highly conserved genes. Here we sequenced and analysed fungal communities of 14 skin sites in 10 healthy adults. Eleven core-body and arm sites were dominated by fungi of the genus Malassezia, with only species-level classifications revealing fungal-community composition differences between sites. By contrast, three foot sites--plantar heel, toenail and toe web--showed high fungal diversity. Concurrent analysis of bacterial and fungal communities demonstrated that physiologic attributes and topography of skin differentially shape these two microbial communities. These results provide a framework for future investigation of the contribution of interactions between pathogenic and commensal fungal and bacterial communities to the maintainenace of human health and to disease pathogenesis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12171

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Skin samples enriched for Malassezia species, including M. globosa, M. furfur, M. restricta, and M. arunalokei, which dominate the healthy human skin mycobiome, were rarely positive for C. auris.

    “Skin samples enriched for Malassezia species, including M. globosa, M. furfur, M. restricta, and M. arunalokei, which dominate the healthy human skin mycobiome, were rarely positive for C. auris [12,69].”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

    The Human Skin Fungal Diversity section reports that Malassezia predominated at eleven skin sites in healthy volunteers, with M. restricta and M. globosa predominant at particular sites. It does not establish that all four named species dominate healthy skin; its species list does not include M. arunalokei. The paper also does not report whether Malassezia-enriched samples were positive for C. auris. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Skin microbial communities can restrict bacterial pathogens through metabolic competition and immune modulation.

    “Since skin microbial communities can restrict bacterial pathogens through metabolic competition and immune modulation [69–72]”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [69]

    The discussion in our copy says microbial community instability may give potentially pathogenic microbes an opportunity to establish disease, but it does not say that skin communities restrict bacterial pathogens. Its mention of immune effects concerns fungal commensals in intestinal disease. Searches for metabolic competition and immune modulation found no passage establishing either proposed mechanism on skin. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [2]Grice EA Topographical and temporal diversity of the human skin microbiome Science 324 1190 2 2009 19478181 PMC2805064
  2. [6]Edgar RC Haas BJ Clemente JC Quince C Knight R UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection Bioinformatics 27 2194 200 2011 21700674 PMC3150044
  3. [7]Schloss PD Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities Appl Environ Microbiol 75 7537 41 2009 19801464 PMC2786419
  4. [15]Matsen FA Kodner RB Armbrust EV pplacer: linear time maximum-likelihood and Bayesian phylogenetic placement of sequences onto a fixed reference tree BMC Bioinformatics 11 538 2010 21034504 PMC3098090

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NIH Intramural Sequencing Center Comparative Sequencing Program, Findley, K., Oh, J., Yang, J., Conlan, S., Deming, C., Meyer, J. A., Schoenfeld, D., Nomicos, E., Park, M., Kong, H. H., & Segre, J. A.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Kong, Heidi H.
  • Segre, Julia A.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-05-22
Volume
498
Issue
7454
Pages
367-370
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2074335138
Cited by
1,206
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 73 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 133 · 2019: 105 · 2018: 73 · 2017: 89 · 2016: 76 · 2015: 70 · 2014: 60 · 2013: 23
FWCI
50.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (ZIAHG000180)
  • National Cancer Institute (ZIABC010938)
  • National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (4UH3 AR057504-02, 1UH2AR057504-01, 1K99AR059222)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Nail Diseases and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
Keywords
skin microbiome, fungal communities, bacterial communities, Malassezia, skin topography, tinea pedis, toenail infection, microbial community stability, commensal microbiota, fungal diversity
MeSH terms
Adult, Bacteria, District of Columbia, Female, Fungi, Health, Homeostasis, Humans, Malassezia, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Skin, Databases, Genetic, Biodiversity, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review